Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28732183›Full record

ReviewJournal of dental research2017

New Resins for Dental Composites.

A P P Fugolin, C S Pfeifer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of dental research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A P P Fugolin1 Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
C S Pfeifer1 Biomaterials and Biomechanics, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

Tertiary methacrylamides and thiourethane additives as novel dental compositesU01DE023756 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FERRACANE, JACK L., PFEIFER, CARMEM S. · 2013 to 2017
$2.4M
Smart Self-Sterilizing Dental Composites for Class V RestorationsR01DE026113 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI FERRACANE, JACK L., MERRITT, JUSTIN · 2016 to 2018
$1.2M
Novel dental composites based on methacrylamides and thiourethane oligomersK02DE025280 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PFEIFER, CARMEM S. · 2016 to 2020
$600k
Thiourethanes as low-stress modifiers in dental compositesR15DE023211 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI PFEIFER, CARMEM S. · 2013 to 2013
$430k
NIDCR NIH HHS K02 DE025280NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026113NIDCR NIH HHS R15 DE023211NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE023756
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Restorative composites have evolved significantly since they were first introduced in the early 1960s, with most of the development concentrating on the filler technology. This has led to improved mechanical properties, notably wear resistance, and has expanded the use of composites to larger posterior restorations. On the organic matrix side, concerns over the polymerization stress and the potential damage to the bonded interface have dominated research in the past 20 y, with many "low-shrinkage" composites being launched commercially. The lack of clinical correlation between the use of these materials and improved restoration outcomes has shifted the focus more recently to improving materials' resistance to degradation in the oral environment, caused by aqueous solvents and salivary enzymes, as well as biofilm development. Antimicrobial and ester-free monomers have been developed in the recent past, and evidence is mounting for their potential benefit. This article reviews literature on the newest materials currently on the market and provides an outlook for the future developments needed to improve restoration longevity past the average 10 y.

Indexed as

Dental Restoration, PermanentBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateComposite ResinsDental MaterialsDental Stress AnalysisHumansMaterials TestingMethacrylatesPolymerizationSurface PropertiesBisphenol A-Glycidyl MethacrylateComposite ResinsDental MaterialsMethacrylatesBisGMAcomposite resinsmethacrylatespermanent dental restorationspolymerizationstress

Identifiers

PMID28732183
PMCPMC5582688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.