Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28732054›Full record

SynthesisPloS one2017

Types of devices used in ridge split procedure for alveolar bone expansion: A systematic review.

Nayansi Jha, Eun Ha Choi, Nagendra Kumar Kaushik, Jae Jun Ryu

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06426719 (Efficiency of Using Osseodensification Protocol for Alveolar Ridge Expansion in Edentulous Alveolar Ridges), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06426719 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

Efficiency of Using Osseodensification Protocol for Alveolar Ridge Expansion in Edentulous Alveolar Ridges

TypeinterventionalSponsorMohamed Magdy Mostafa ShehataRan2022 to 2024Enrolled18ConditionsAlveolar Bone ResorptionArmsAlveolar ridge wideninig via applying osseodensification protocol using densah burs, Alveolar ridge widening via hand osteotomes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nayansi JhaDepartment of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Eun Ha ChoiPlasma Bioscience Research Centre and Department of Electrical & Biological Physics, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Nagendra Kumar KaushikPlasma Bioscience Research Centre and Department of Electrical & Biological Physics, Kwangwoon University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Jae Jun RyuDepartment of Prosthodontics, Graduate School of Clinical Dentistry, Korea University Anam Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Korea University · KRKwangwoon University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate instrumentation procedures of the alveolar ridge expansion technique (ARST) with or without Guided Bone Regeneration (GBR) and to identify the most used instruments for successful outcome. An electronic as well as manual literature search was conducted in several databases including Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, for articles written in English up to September 2016. The question in focus was to identify the type of device for ridge expansion that is most frequently used and provides adequate bone expansion and implant success rate. To meet the inclusion criteria, the studies were analysed for the following parameters: prospective or retrospective studies, cohort or case studies/series, cases with 5 or more human subjects, type of device used for surgery, location of defect, and minimum follow up period. The frequency of osteotome usage in this study was approximately 65%, and on average, the implant success was 97%. The motorized expanders and ultrasonic surgery system are easier to use and cause less trauma to the bone compared to the traditional/conventional instruments like mallets and osteotomes. However, their cost is a limiting factor; hence, osteotomes remain a popular mode of instrumentation.

Indexed as

Alveolar ProcessDental Implantation, EndosseousHumans

Identifiers

PMID28732054
PMCPMC5521746
OpenAlexW2736658878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.