Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28732021›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

In Vitro comparison of 213Bi- and 177Lu-radiation for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Ho Sze Chan, Erik de Blois, Alfred Morgenstern, Frank Bruchertseifer, Marion de Jong, Wouter Breeman, Mark Konijnenberg

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. EANM position paper on the role of radiobiology in nuclear medicine.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021
    Article
  14. Evaluation of Ac-LysJournal of neuro-oncology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Evolution of Neuroendocrine Tumor Therapy.Surgical oncology clinics of North America · 2020
    Review
  20. Cellular dosimetry of [EJNMMI physics · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ho Sze ChanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7873-6542
Erik de BloisDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Alfred MorgensternEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Frank BruchertseiferEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements (ITU), Karlsruhe, Germany.
Marion de JongDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Wouter BreemanDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Mark KonijnenbergDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC · NLJoint Research Centre · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAbsorbed doses for α-emitters are different from those for β-emitters, as the high linear energy transfer (LET) nature of α-particles results in a very dense energy deposition over a relatively short path length near the point of emission. This highly localized and therefore high energy deposition can lead to enhanced cell-killing effects at absorbed doses that are non-lethal in low-LET type of exposure. Affinities of DOTA-DPhe1-Tyr3-octreotate (DOTATATE), 115In-DOTATATE, 175Lu-DOTATATE and 209Bi-DOTATATE were determined in the K562-SST2 cell line. Two other cell lines were used for radiation response assessment; BON and CA20948, with a low and high expression of somatostatin receptors, respectively. Cellular uptake kinetics of 111In-DOTATATE were determined in CA20948 cells. CA20948 and BON were irradiated with 137Cs, 177Lu-DTPA, 177Lu-DOTATATE, 213Bi-DTPA and 213Bi-DOTATATE. Absorbed doses were calculated using the MIRDcell dosimetry method for the specific binding and a Monte Carlo model of a cylindrical 6-well plate geometry for the exposure by the radioactive incubation medium. Absorbed doses were compared to conventional irradiation of cells with 137Cs and the relative biological effect (RBE) at 10% survival was calculated.

resultsIC50 of (labelled) DOTATATE was in the nM range. Absorbed doses up to 7 Gy were obtained by 5.2 MBq 213Bi-DOTATATE, in majority the dose was caused by α-particle radiation. Cellular internalization determined with 111In-DOTATATE showed a linear relation with incubation time. Cell survival after exposure of 213Bi-DTPA and 213Bi-DOTATATE to BON or CA20948 cells showed a linear-exponential relation with the absorbed dose, confirming the high LET character of 213Bi. The survival of CA20948 after exposure to 177Lu-DOTATATE and the reference 137Cs irradiation showed the typical curvature of the linear-quadratic model. 10% Cell survival of CA20948 was reached at 3 Gy with 213Bi-DOTATATE, a factor 6 lower than the 18 Gy found for 177Lu-DOTATATE and also below the 5 Gy after 137Cs external exposure.

conclusion213Bi-DTPA and 213Bi-DOTATATE lead to a factor 6 advantage in cell killing compared to 177Lu-DOTATATE. The RBE at 10% survival by 213Bi-ligand compared to 137Cs was 2.0 whereas the RBE for 177Lu-DOTATATE was 0.3 in the CA20948 in vitro model.

Indexed as

Absorption, RadiationBismuthLutetiumRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsCell Line, TumorCell SurvivalDose-Response Relationship, RadiationHumansKineticsLinear Energy TransferModels, BiologicalMonte Carlo MethodOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsRadiometryBismuthLutetiumOctreotideOrganometallic CompoundsRadioisotopesRadiopharmaceuticalsReceptors, SomatostatinSSTR2 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28732021
PMCPMC5521788
OpenAlexW2736633767

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.