Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28731478›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2017

Role of plant-fungal nutrient trading and host control in determining the competitive success of ectomycorrhizal fungi.

Sara Hortal, Krista Lynn Plett, Jonathan Michael Plett, Tom Cresswell, Mathew Johansen, Elise Pendall, Ian Charles Anderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Mycorrhizal symbiosis and the nitrogen nutrition of forest trees.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sara HortalWestern Sydney University, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Krista Lynn PlettWestern Sydney University, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Jonathan Michael PlettWestern Sydney University, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Tom CresswellAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Kirrawee DC, NSW, Australia.
Mathew JohansenAustralian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, Kirrawee DC, NSW, Australia.
Elise PendallWestern Sydney University, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Penrith, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1651-8969
Ian Charles AndersonWestern Sydney University, Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple ectomycorrhizal fungi (EMF) compete to colonise the roots of a host plant, but it is not known whether their success is under plant or fungal control, or a combination of both. We assessed whether plants control EMF colonisation by preferentially allocating more carbon to more beneficial partners in terms of nitrogen supply or if other factors drive competitive success. We combined stable isotope labelling and RNA-sequencing approaches to characterise nutrient exchange between the plant host Eucalyptus grandis and three Pisolithus isolates when growing alone and when competing either indirectly (with a physical barrier) or directly. Overall, we found that nitrogen provision to the plant does not explain the amount of carbon that an isolate receives nor the number of roots that it colonises. Differences in nutrient exchange among isolates were related to differences in expression of key fungal and plant nitrogen and carbon transporter genes. When given a choice of partners, the plant was able to limit colonisation by the least cooperative isolate. This was not explained by a reduction in allocated carbon. Instead, our results suggest that partner choice in EMF could operate through the upregulation of defence-related genes against those fungi providing fewer nutrients.

Indexed as

CarbonFungiMycorrhizaeNitrogenPlant RootsPlantsSymbiosisCarbonNitrogen

Identifiers

PMID28731478
PMCPMC5702723

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.