Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28731467›Full record

ArticleThe ISME journal2017

Uncultivated microbes in need of their own taxonomy.

Konstantinos T Konstantinidis, Ramon Rosselló-Móra, Rudolf Amann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ISME journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 380 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
380citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

380 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Bridging the gap:Gut microbes · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. The Genomic Characterization of a NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  6. Draft genome sequence ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Streptomyces odontotermitis Odt1-20BThe Journal of antibiotics · 2026
    Article
  10. Reliable delineation ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Paired genomic and proteomic analysis ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2026
    Article
  20. Article

320 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Konstantinos T KonstantinidisSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering and School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Ramon Rosselló-MóraMarine Microbiology Group, Institut Mediterrani d'Estudis Avançats (IMEDEA; CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Spain.
Rudolf AmannMax Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology, Bremen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The great majority of microbial species remains uncultured, severely limiting their taxonomic characterization and thus communication among scientists. Although Candidatus was devised as a provisional category to classify uncultured taxa, it has not been widely accepted owing to technical limitations and lack of priority of Candidatus names in the official nomenclature. High-throughput sequencing provides the potential for data-rich taxonomic descriptions of uncultivated microbes, comparable in quality to those of cultured organisms. In order to fully realize this potential, standards and guidelines on how to perform these descriptions are needed. Here we aimed to outline these standards and draw the roadmap for a new genome-based taxonomy that, at least initially, would be parallel but highly convergent to the one in existence for isolates. In particular, we recommend the use of DNA genome sequences, recovered by population binning or single-cell techniques, as the basis for (i) identification and phylogenetic placement, (ii) bioinformatics-based functional and thus phenotypic predictions, as well as (iii) type material. We also recommend the implementation of an independent nomenclatural system for uncultivated taxa, following the same nomenclature rules as those for cultured Bacteria and Archaea but with its own list of validly published names. If widely adopted, this system will not only facilitate a comprehensive characterization of the 'uncultivated majority', but also provide a unified catalogue of validly published names, thereby avoiding synonyms and confusion. We also suggest that a committee of experts, supported by an international microbiological society, should be formed to govern the new classification system.

Indexed as

ArchaeaBacteriaComputational BiologyPhylogeny

Identifiers

PMID28731467
PMCPMC5649169

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.