Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28731405›Full record

ArticleeLife2017

Pro-death NMDA receptor signaling is promoted by the GluN2B C-terminus independently of Dapk1.

Jamie McQueen, Tomás J Ryan, Sean McKay, Katie Marwick, Paul Baxter, Sarah M Carpanini, Thomas M Wishart, Thomas H Gillingwater, Jean C Manson, David J A Wyllie and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Innovative approaches for the treatment of stroke: a recent update.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Cell-penetrating peptide-conjugated Morpholino rescues SMA in a symptomatic preclinical model.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Jamie McQueenUK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Tomás J RyanSchool of Biochemistry and Immunology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Sean McKayUK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Katie MarwickCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Paul BaxterUK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Sarah M CarpaniniThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Thomas M WishartThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Thomas H GillingwaterUK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Jean C MansonThe Roslin Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
David J A WyllieCentre for Discovery Brain Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4957-6049
Seth G N GrantWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-8732-8735
Barry W McCollUK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-0521-9656
Noboru H KomiyamaWellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, United Kingdom.
Giles E HardinghamUK Dementia Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7629-5314
UK Dementia Research Institute · GBRoslin Institute · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GBHoward Hughes Medical Institute · USUniversity of Edinburgh · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J004332/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/D/20251969Medical Research Council G0902044Medical Research Council MR/L003384/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT088156
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aberrant NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activity contributes to several neurological disorders, but direct antagonism is poorly tolerated therapeutically. The GluN2B cytoplasmic C-terminal domain (CTD) represents an alternative therapeutic target since it potentiates excitotoxic signaling. The key GluN2B CTD-centred event in excitotoxicity is proposed to involve its phosphorylation at Ser-1303 by Dapk1, that is blocked by a neuroprotective cell-permeable peptide mimetic of the region. Contrary to this model, we find that excitotoxicity can proceed without increased Ser-1303 phosphorylation, and is unaffected by Dapk1 deficiency in vitro or following ischemia in vivo. Pharmacological analysis of the aforementioned neuroprotective peptide revealed that it acts in a sequence-independent manner as an open-channel NMDAR antagonist at or near the Mg

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain IschemiaCell DeathCells, CulturedCerebral CortexDeath-Associated Protein KinasesMaleMiceMice, KnockoutNeuronsNeuropeptidesNeuroprotective AgentsPhosphorylationProtein SubunitsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSerineDapk1 protein, mouseDeath-Associated Protein KinasesNeuropeptidesNeuroprotective AgentsNR2B NMDA receptorProtein SubunitsReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateSerinecalcium signalingexcitotoxicitymouseneurodegenerationneuroscienceNMDA receptor

Identifiers

PMID28731405
PMCPMC5544426
OpenAlexW2736433134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.