Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28731385›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of health promotion : AJHP2018

Kids SIP smartER: A Feasibility Study to Reduce Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Middle School Youth in Central Appalachia.

Hannah Lane, Kathleen J Porter, Erin Hecht, Priscilla Harris, Vivica Kraak, Jamie Zoellner

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of health promotion : AJHP, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Measuring implementation fidelity of school-based obesity prevention programmes: a systematic review.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. How does the Kids SIPAmerican journal of agricultural economics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Hannah Lane1 Growth and Nutrition Division, Department of Pediatrics, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kathleen J Porter2 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Erin Hecht2 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Priscilla Harris3 Appalachian School of Law, Grundy, VA, USA.
Vivica Kraak4 Department of Human Nutrition, Foods and Exercise, Virginia Polytechnic and State University, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Jamie Zoellner2 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
University of Virginia · USAppalachian School of Law · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

SIPsmartER: A nutrition literacy approach to reducing sugar-sweetened beveragesR01CA154364 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI ZOELLNER, JAMIE · 2011 to 2015
$2.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo test the feasibility of Kids SIP smartER, a school-based intervention to reduce consumption of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs).

designMatched-contact randomized crossover study with mixed-methods analysis.

settingOne middle school in rural, Appalachian Virginia.

participantsSeventy-four sixth and seventh graders (5 classrooms) received Kids SIP smartER in random order over 2 intervention periods. Feasibility outcomes were assessed among 2 teachers.

interventionKids SIP smartER consisted of 6 lessons grounded in the Theory of Planned Behavior, media literacy, and public health literacy and aimed to improve individual SSB behaviors and understanding of media literacy and prevalent regional disparities. The matched-contact intervention promoted physical activity. MEASURES: Beverage Intake Questionnaire-15 (SSB consumption), validated theory questionnaires, feasibility questionnaires (student and teacher), student focus groups, teacher interviews, and process data (eg, attendance). ANALYSIS: Repeated measures analysis of variances across 3 time points, descriptive statistics, and deductive analysis of qualitative data.

resultsDuring the first intervention period, students receiving Kids SIP smartER (n = 43) significantly reduced SSBs by 11 ounces/day ( P = .01) and improved media ( P < .001) and public health literacy ( P < .01) understanding; however, only media literacy showed between-group differences ( P < .01). Students and teachers found Kids SIP smartER acceptable, in-demand, practical, and implementable within existing resources.

conclusionKids SIP smartER is feasible in an underresourced, rural school setting. Results will inform further development and large-scale testing of Kids SIP smartER to reduce SSBs among rural adolescents.

Indexed as

Adolescent BehaviorHealth BehaviorAdolescentAppalachian RegionBeveragesCross-Over StudiesDietary SucroseFeasibility StudiesFeeding BehaviorFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleProgram EvaluationRural PopulationSchoolsDietary SucroseAppalachiachild or adolescentfeasibilitysugar-sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID28731385
PMCPMC5993639
OpenAlexW2738743251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.