Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28731172›Full record

ArticleMolecular medicine reports2017

Comparison of the neuronal differentiation abilities of bone marrow‑derived and adipose tissue‑derived mesenchymal stem cells.

Yani Zheng, Chao Huang, Fang Liu, Haiyan Lin, Xiangqun Yang, Zhiying Zhang

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular medicine reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for pulmonary hypertension: an update.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yani ZhengDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China.
Chao HuangDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China.
Fang LiuDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China.
Haiyan LinDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China.
Xiangqun YangDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China.
Zhiying ZhangDepartment of Anatomy, Institute of Biomedical Engineering, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China.
Second Military Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and adipose tissue‑derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) are able to differentiate into neuron‑like cells when exposed to small molecule compounds, however the specific differences in their neuronal differentiation abilities remain to be fully elucidated. The present study aimed to compare the neuronal differentiation abilities of BMSCs and ADSCs. BMSCs and ADSCs from the same Sprague Dawley rats were isolated and cultured for use. The proliferation capacity was revealed using a cell counting method. Following BMSCs and ADSCs induction by four types of small‑molecular compounds, the expression of various neuronal markers and the secretion of several neurotrophic factors were detected by immunofluorescence, western blotting, reverse transcription‑quantitative polymerase chain reaction and ELISA. It was demonstrated that the ADSCs exhibited an increased proliferation capacity compared with BMSCs, according to cumulative population doubling analyses. Following a 7‑day neuronal induction period, BMSCs and ADSCs exhibited a neuron‑like morphology, and were termed neuronal induced (NI)‑BMSCs and NI‑ADSCs. They expressed neuronal markers including β‑tubulin III, microtubule associated protein 2 and choline acetyltransferase. The number of NI‑BMSCs that positively expressed the neuronal markers was significantly decreased compared with NI‑ADSCs, and the expression and secretion of the neurotrophic factors nerve growth factor and 3'‑nucleotidase in NI‑BMSCs were additionally decreased compared with NI‑ADSCs. The findings of the present study indicated that the neuronal differentiation abilities and neurotrophic factor secretion abilities of ADSCs were increased compared with BMSCs. ADSCs may therefore act as efficient candidates in cell transplantation therapy for diseases and injuries of the nervous system.

Indexed as

Cell DifferentiationAdipose TissueAnimalsBiomarkersBone Marrow CellsCell ProliferationCell ShapeEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayGene Expression RegulationMaleMesenchymal Stem CellsNerve Growth FactorsNeuronsRats, Sprague-DawleyTranscription, GeneticBiomarkersNerve Growth Factors

Identifiers

PMID28731172
PMCPMC5646965
OpenAlexW2738829557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.