Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28731036›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2017

Stroke in women - from evidence to inequalities.

Charlotte Cordonnier, Nikola Sprigg, Else Charlotte Sandset, Aleksandra Pavlovic, Katharina S Sunnerhagen, Valeria Caso, Hanne Christensen, Women Initiative for Stroke in Europe (WISE) group

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Frontiers in global women's health · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. COVID-19 and stroke in women: impact on clinical, psychosocial and research aspects.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 8 countries.

Charlotte CordonnierUniversity of Lille, INSERM U1171, Degenerative &vascular cognitive disorders, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Department of Neurology, F-59000 Lille, France.
Nikola SpriggDivision of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Nottingham, Hucknall Road, NG5 1PB, UK.
Else Charlotte SandsetDepartment of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway and the George Institute of Public Health, Sydney, Australia.
Aleksandra PavlovicNeurology Clinic, Clinical Center of Serbia, Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica 6, Belgrade 11000, Serbia.
Katharina S SunnerhagenRehabilitation Medicine, Sect for Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, the Sahlgrenska Academy, Blå Stråket 7, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden.
Valeria CasoStroke Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia Hospital, University of Perugia, Via E. Dottori, 06156 Perugia, Italy.
Hanne ChristensenDepartment of Neurology, Bispebjerg og Frederiksberg Hospital, Bispebjerg Bakke 23, University of Copenhagen, 2400 NV, Denmark.
Women Initiative for Stroke in Europe (WISE) group
Oslo University Hospital · NOFrederiksberg Hospital · DKInserm · FRUniversity of Belgrade · RSUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Nottingham · GBUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Stroke is the second largest cause of disability-adjusted life-years lost worldwide. The prevalence of stroke in women is predicted to rise rapidly, owing to the increasing average age of the global female population. Vascular risk factors differ between women and men in terms of prevalence, and evidence increasingly supports the clinical importance of sex differences in stroke. The influence of some risk factors for stroke - including diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation - are stronger in women, and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy also affect the risk of stroke decades after pregnancy. However, in an era of evidence-based medicine, women are notably under-represented in clinical trials - despite governmental actions highlighting the need to include both men and women in clinical trials - resulting in a reduced generalizability of study results to women. The aim of this Review is to highlight new insights into specificities of stroke in women, to plan future research priorities, and to influence public health policies to decrease the worldwide burden of stroke in women.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesHealth Status DisparitiesMenopauseSocial ClassWomen's HealthDepressive DisorderFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularStroke

Identifiers

PMID28731036
OpenAlexW2736457485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.