Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28730643›Full record

ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI2018

Differences in gadolinium retention after repeated injections of macrocyclic MR contrast agents to rats.

Simona Bussi, Alessandra Coppo, Catherine Botteron, Valérie Fraimbault, Antonello Fanizzi, Elisa De Laurentiis, Sonia Colombo Serra, Miles A Kirchin, Fabio Tedoldi, Federico Maisano

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Simona BussiBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Alessandra CoppoBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Catherine BotteronBracco Suisse SA, Plan-les-Ouates, GE, Switzerland.
Valérie FraimbaultBracco Suisse SA, Plan-les-Ouates, GE, Switzerland.
Antonello FanizziBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Elisa De LaurentiisBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Sonia Colombo SerraBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Miles A KirchinBracco Imaging SpA, Worldwide Medical Affairs, Milano, Italy.
Fabio TedoldiBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Federico MaisanoBracco Imaging SpA, Bracco Research Centre, Colleretto Giacosa, TO, Italy.
Bracco (Italy) · ITBracco (Switzerland) · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo compare the levels of gadolinium in the blood, cerebrum, cerebellum, liver, femur, kidneys, and skin after multiple exposure of rats to the macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) gadoterate, gadobutrol, and gadoteridol. MATERIALS AND

methodsFifty male Wistar Han rats were randomized to three exposure groups (n = 15 per group) and one control group (n = 5). Animals in the exposure groups received a total of 20 GBCA administrations (four administrations per week for 5 consecutive weeks) at a dose of 0.6 mmol/kg bodyweight. After a 28-day recovery period animals were sacrificed and the blood and tissues harvested for determination of gadolinium (Gd) levels. Gd determination was performed by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).

resultsAfter 28 days' recovery no Gd was found in the blood, liver, or skin of any animal in any group. Significantly lower levels of Gd were noted with gadoteridol compared to gadoterate and gadobutrol in the cerebellum (0.150 ± 0.022 vs. 0.292 ± 0.057 and 0.287 ± 0.056 nmol/g, respectively; P < 0.001), cerebrum (0.116 ± 0.036 vs. 0.250 ± 0.032 and 0.263 ± 0.045 nmol/g, respectively; P < 0.001), and kidneys (25 ± 13 vs. 139 ± 88 [P < 0.01] and 204 ± 109 [P < 0.001], respectively). Higher levels of Gd were noted in the femur (7.48 ± 1.37 vs. 5.69 ± 1.75 and 8.60 ± 2.04 nmol/g, respectively) with significantly less Gd determined for gadoterate than for gadobutrol (P < 0.001) and gadoteridol (P < 0.05).

conclusionDifferences exist between macrocyclic agents in terms of their propensity to accumulate in tissues. The observed differences in Gd concentration point to differences in GBCA washout rates in this setting and in this experimental model, with gadoteridol being the GBCA that is most efficiently removed from both cerebral and renal tissues. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Technical Efficacy: Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2018;47:746-752.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrainContrast MediaFemurGadoliniumHeterocyclic CompoundsKidneyLiverMaleModels, AnimalOrganometallic CompoundsRatsRats, WistarSkinContrast MediagadobutrolGadoliniumgadolinium 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-N,N',N'',N'''-tetraacetategadoteridolHeterocyclic CompoundsOrganometallic Compoundsgadolinium based contrast agentsGBCAGd depositionmacrocyclic

Identifiers

PMID28730643
PMCPMC5836870
OpenAlexW2737069440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.