Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28730541›Full record

ArticleMycorrhiza2017

Increased sequencing depth does not increase captured diversity of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi.

Martti Vasar, Reidar Andreson, John Davison, Teele Jairus, Mari Moora, Maido Remm, J P W Young, Martin Zobel, Maarja Öpik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycorrhiza, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martti VasarDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Str, 51005, Tartu, Estonia. martti.vasar@ut.ee.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4674-932X
Reidar AndresonInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, 23b Riia Str, 51010, Tartu, Estonia.
John DavisonDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Str, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
Teele JairusDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Str, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
Mari MooraDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Str, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
Maido RemmInstitute of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of Tartu, 23b Riia Str, 51010, Tartu, Estonia.
J P W YoungDepartment of Biology, University of York, York, YO10 5DD, UK.
Martin ZobelDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Str, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.
Maarja ÖpikDepartment of Botany, Institute of Ecology and Earth Sciences, University of Tartu, 40 Lai Str, 51005, Tartu, Estonia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The arrival of 454 sequencing represented a major breakthrough by allowing deeper sequencing of environmental samples than was possible with existing Sanger approaches. Illumina MiSeq provides a further increase in sequencing depth but shorter read length compared with 454 sequencing. We explored whether Illumina sequencing improves estimates of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal richness in plant root samples, compared with 454 sequencing. We identified AM fungi in root samples by sequencing amplicons of the SSU rRNA gene with 454 and Illumina MiSeq paired-end sequencing. In addition, we sequenced metagenomic DNA without prior PCR amplification. Amplicon-based Illumina sequencing yielded two orders of magnitude higher sequencing depth per sample than 454 sequencing. Initial analysis with minimal quality control recorded five times higher AM fungal richness per sample with Illumina sequencing. Additional quality control of Illumina samples, including restriction of the marker region to the most variable amplicon fragment, revealed AM fungal richness values close to those produced by 454 sequencing. Furthermore, AM fungal richness estimates were not correlated with sequencing depth between 300 and 30,000 reads per sample, suggesting that the lower end of this range is sufficient for adequate description of AM fungal communities. By contrast, metagenomic Illumina sequencing yielded very few AM fungal reads and taxa and was dominated by plant DNA, suggesting that AM fungal DNA is present at prohibitively low abundance in colonised root samples. In conclusion, Illumina MiSeq sequencing yielded higher sequencing depth, but similar richness of AM fungi in root samples, compared with 454 sequencing.

Indexed as

BiodiversityDNA, FungalHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingMycorrhizaeDNA, Fungal454 SequencingArbuscular mycorrhizaCommunity diversityIllumina sequencing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.