Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28730498›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2017

Informatics Approaches for Predicting, Understanding, and Testing Cancer Drug Combinations.

Jing Tang

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Tumor-specific radiosensitizing effect of the ATM inhibitor AZD0156 in melanoma cells with low toxicity to healthy fibroblasts.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Broadening the spectrum of ivermectin: Its effect onFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Charting the Fragmented Landscape of Drug Synergy.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jing TangInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM), University of Helsinki, Tukholmankatu 8, 00290, Helsinki, Finland. jing.tang@helsinki.fi.
University of Helsinki · FI

Funding

European Research Council 716063
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Making cancer treatment more effective is one of the grand challenges in our health care system. However, many drugs have entered clinical trials but so far showed limited efficacy or induced rapid development of resistance. We urgently need multi-targeted drug combinations, which shall selectively inhibit the cancer cells and block the emergence of drug resistance. The book chapter focuses on mathematical and computational tools to facilitate the discovery of the most promising drug combinations to improve efficacy and prevent resistance. Data integration approaches that leverage drug-target interactions, cancer molecular features, and signaling pathways for predicting, understanding, and testing drug combinations are critically reviewed.

Indexed as

Drug InteractionsDrug Therapy, CombinationAntineoplastic AgentsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsComputational BiologyDatabases, FactualDrug DesignDrug DiscoveryGene Expression RegulationHumansModels, StatisticalModels, TheoreticalAntineoplastic AgentsData integrationDrug combinationsInformatics approachesMathematical modeling

Identifiers

PMID28730498
PMCPMC6322649
OpenAlexW2739326744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.