ReviewCurrent urology reports2017
Non-neurogenic Chronic Urinary Retention: What Are We Treating?
Review in Current urology reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- A randomized controlled trial of neuromuscular electrical stimulation for chronic urinary retention following traumatic brain injury.Medicine · 2019Trial
- Efficacy and durability of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate in the management of acute and chronic urinary retention A retrospective study.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Article
- Efficacy of GreenLight laser prostatectomy in urinary retention.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2024Article
- Effects of electroacupuncture on chronic urinary retention after pelvic or lumbosacral tumor resection surgeries: a retrospective cohort study.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Article
- Early and late outcomes of transurethral prostatectomy in men with significant postvoid residual volumes and mild or no lower urinary tract symptoms.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2022Article
- HoLEP for acute and non-neurogenic chronic urinary retention: how effective is it?World journal of urology · 2021Article
- Effectiveness of Acupuncture on Urinary Retention: A Meta-Analysis.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021Review
- Smooth muscle-specific deletion of MnSOD exacerbates diabetes-induced bladder dysfunction in mice.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2019Article
- Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewThis review examines current terminology used to define non-neurogenic chronic urinary retention (CUR), describes the pathophysiology of urinary retention, and highlights contemporary diagnostic and treatment algorithms. RECENT
findingsThere is no standardized definition for the condition, but volumes >300 ml are commonly used to describe CUR. It is a clinical diagnosis which does not require urodynamics. Pathophysiologic causes of CUR be from myogenic, neurogenic, bladder outlet obstruction, or a combination of these sources. Treatment algorithms recommend stratifying patients with chronic urinary retention by risk and by symptoms before initiating treatment. Common CUR outcome endpoints need to be better utilized so that treatment modalities can be compared. Non-neurogenic CUR is a heterogeneous condition that has multiple definitions, underlying physiologies, and possible endpoints. Standardization is needed to better understand and treat CUR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28730405What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.