Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28730296›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2018

Early computed tomography or focused assessment with sonography in abdominal trauma: what are the leading opinions?

L Grünherz, K O Jensen, V Neuhaus, L Mica, C M L Werner, B Ciritsis, C Michelitsch, G Osterhoff, H-P Simmen, K Sprengel

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Massive Trauma and Resuscitation Strategies.Anesthesiology clinics · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Focus on imaging in trauma.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2018
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

L GrünherzDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
K O JensenDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
V NeuhausDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
L MicaDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
C M L WernerDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
B CiritsisDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
C MichelitschDivision of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Grisons, Loestrasse 170, 7000, Chur, Switzerland.
G OsterhoffDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
H-P SimmenDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
K SprengelDepartment of Trauma, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland. kai.sprengel@usz.ch.
University of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe initial assessment of severely injured patients in the resuscitation room requires a systematic and quickly performed survey. Whereas the Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS

methodsAn online cross-sectional survey was performed over 8 months. Members of the Swiss Society for Surgery and the Austrian and German associations for trauma surgery were invited to answer nine online questions.

resultsOverall, 175 trauma surgeons from 155 departments participated. For haemodynamically stable patients, most considered FAST (77.6%) and early CT (82.3%) to be the ideal diagnostic tools. For haemodynamically unstable patients, 93.4% considered FAST to be mandatory. For CT imaging in unstable patients, 47.5% agreed with the use of CT, whereas 52.5% rated early CT as not essential. For unstable patients with pathological FAST and clinical signs, 86.8% agreed to proceed with immediate laparotomy.

conclusionsMost surgeons rely on early CT for haemodynamically stable patients with abdominal trauma, whereas FAST is performed with similar frequency and is prioritized in unstable patients. It seems that the results of recent studies supporting early WBCT have not yet found broad acceptance in the surgical community.

Indexed as

Critical CareLaparotomyTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyAbdominal InjuriesAdvanced Trauma Life Support CareAlgorithmsAustriaConsensusCross-Sectional StudiesGermanyHemodynamicsHumansPhysical ExaminationPractice Patterns, Physicians'ResuscitationAbdominal injuriesAdvanced trauma life supportUltrasonographyWhole-body imaging

Identifiers

PMID28730296
OpenAlexW2736374603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.