Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28730071›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2017

Effect of sorafenib in a murine high risk penetrating keratoplasty model.

Yang Kyung Cho, Eun Young Shin, Hironori Uehara, Balamurali K Ambati

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Yang Kyung ChoDepartment of Ophthalmology, St.Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Gyeonggi-Do 16247, Korea.
Eun Young ShinResearch Institute of Medical Science, St.Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, the Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Gyeonggi-Do 16247, Korea.
Hironori UeharaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
Balamurali K AmbatiDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Utah, School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah 84132, USA.
The Catholic University of Korea St. Vincent's Hospital · KRUniversity of Utah · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo evaluate the effect of sorafenib in murine high risk keratoplasty model.

methodsGraft survival, corneal neovascularization, and corneal lymphangiogenesis were compared among the sorafenib, dexamethasone, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), and phosphate buffered saline (PBS) groups following subconjunctival injection in mice that underwent high risk penetrating keratoplasty (HRPK). Real-time polymerase chain reaction was performed to quantify the expression of inflammatory cytokines and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-A, VEGF-C, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-2, VEGFR-3.

resultsThe two-month graft survival rate for HRPK was 42.86% in sorafenib group, 37.50% in dexamethasone group, 0 in DMSO group, and 0 in PBS group. Sorafenib significantly increased graft survival compared to the DMSO and PBS group (

conclusionThe subconjunctivally administered sorafenib shows significant anti-lymphangiogenic effect, resulting in increased transplant survival in a murine high risk keratoplasty model. We suggest that a close linkage between decreased VEGF-C/VEGFR-2 and -3 signaling and increased corneal graft survival by sorafenib seems to exist.

Indexed as

dexamethasonegraft survivallymphangiogenesisneovascularizationsorafenib

Identifiers

PMID28730071
PMCPMC5515157
OpenAlexW2739861976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.