Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28729945›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2017

Validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients.

Eija Rosti-Otajärvi, Päivi Hämäläinen, Anna Wiksten, Tanja Hakkarainen, Juhani Ruutiainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Network Localization of Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis.Annals of clinical and translational neurology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eija Rosti-OtajärviDepartment of Neurosciences and Rehabilitation Tampere University Hospital Tampere Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-7428-7209
Päivi HämäläinenFinnish Neuro Society Masku Finland.
Anna WikstenStat Finn Oy Turku Finland.
Tanja HakkarainenNovartis Finland Oy Espoo Finland.
Juhani RuutiainenFinnish Neuro Society Masku Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFatigue is one of the most debilitating symptoms in multiple sclerosis (MS) considerably interfering with patients' daily functioning. Both researchers and clinicians need psychometrically robust methods to evaluate fatigue in MS.

objectivesThe objective of this study was (i) to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Finnish version of the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and (ii) to describe the results among patients with MS.

methodsIn total, 553 patients with MS (mean age, 53.8 years; standard deviation [

resultsThe mean (

conclusionsThe Finnish version of the FSS showed satisfactory reliability and validity and thus can be regarded as a feasible measure of self-reported fatigue.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingFatigueMultiple SclerosisPsychometricsQuality of LifeDisability EvaluationFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFinlandHumansMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsSelf ReportSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesfatigueFatigue Severity Scalemultiple sclerosisreliabilityself‐reportvalidity

Identifiers

PMID28729945
PMCPMC5516613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.