ArticleAdvances in neural information processing systems2016
Deep Learning Models of the Retinal Response to Natural Scenes.
Article in Advances in neural information processing systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
103 citing papers in PubMed.
- Inhibition benefits neural system identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Spatial Adaptation of Primate Retinal Ganglion Cells Between Artificial and Natural Stimuli.eNeuro · 2026Article
- The functional organization of retinal input to the mouse superior colliculus.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A heterogeneous population code at the first synapse of vision.Nature communications · 2026Article
- JAXLEY: differentiable simulation enables large-scale training of detailed biophysical models of neural dynamics.Nature methods · 2025Article
- Exploring the Architectural Biases of the Cortical Microcircuit.Neural computation · 2025Article
- Article
- Optimal feature encoding in early vision.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Learning to cluster neuronal function.ArXiv · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
- Motion feature extraction using magnocellular-inspired spiking neural networks for drone detection.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2025Article
- Modelling neural coding in the auditory midbrain with high resolution and accuracy.Nature machine intelligence · 2025Article
- Predictably manipulating photoreceptor light responses to reveal their role in downstream visual responses.eLife · 2024Article
- Adaptation of retinal discriminability to natural scenes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Article
- Fixational eye movements enhance the precision of visual information transmitted by the primate retina.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Foundation model of neural activity predicts response to new stimulus types and anatomy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Predictably manipulating photoreceptor light responses to reveal their role in downstream visual responses.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Fixational Eye Movements Enhance the Precision of Visual Information Transmitted by the Primate Retina.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A central challenge in sensory neuroscience is to understand neural computations and circuit mechanisms that underlie the encoding of ethologically relevant, natural stimuli. In multilayered neural circuits, nonlinear processes such as synaptic transmission and spiking dynamics present a significant obstacle to the creation of accurate computational models of responses to natural stimuli. Here we demonstrate that deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) capture retinal responses to natural scenes nearly to within the variability of a cell's response, and are markedly more accurate than linear-nonlinear (LN) models and Generalized Linear Models (GLMs). Moreover, we find two additional surprising properties of CNNs: they are less susceptible to overfitting than their LN counterparts when trained on small amounts of data, and generalize better when tested on stimuli drawn from a different distribution (e.g. between natural scenes and white noise). An examination of the learned CNNs reveals several properties. First, a richer set of feature maps is necessary for predicting the responses to natural scenes compared to white noise. Second, temporally precise responses to slowly varying inputs originate from feedforward inhibition, similar to known retinal mechanisms. Third, the injection of latent noise sources in intermediate layers enables our model to capture the sub-Poisson spiking variability observed in retinal ganglion cells. Fourth, augmenting our CNNs with recurrent lateral connections enables them to capture contrast adaptation as an emergent property of accurately describing retinal responses to natural scenes. These methods can be readily generalized to other sensory modalities and stimulus ensembles. Overall, this work demonstrates that CNNs not only accurately capture sensory circuit responses to natural scenes, but also can yield information about the circuit's internal structure and function.
Identifiers
28729779PMC5515384What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.