ArticleScientific reports2017
Comparison of traditional and new generation DNA markers declares high genetic diversity and differentiated population structure of wild almond species.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Molecular insights into the genetic diversity and population structure ofRevista brasileira de botanica : Brazilian journal of botany · 2023Article
- Development of 16 novel EST-SSR markers for species identification and cross-genus amplification in sambar, sika, and red deer.PloS one · 2022Article
- Mitochondrial relationships between various chamomile accessions.Journal of applied genetics · 2021Article
- Retrotransposable Elements: DNA Fingerprinting and the Assessment of Genetic Diversity.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021Article
- Current Situation, Global Potential Distribution and Evolution of Six Almond Species in China.Frontiers in plant science · 2021Article
- Article
- Comparative and Phylogenetic Analyses of the Complete Chloroplast Genomes of Six Almond Species (Prunus spp. L.).Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Genotyping by Sequencing in Almond: SNP Discovery, Linkage Mapping, and Marker Design.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
- Characterization of new microsatellite markers based on the transcriptome sequencing ofHereditas · 2018Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2020-09-22Concerns/Issues about Data · Duplication of/in Image · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Wild almond species as sources of genetic variation may have crucial importance in breeding. A total of 389 accessions of 18 species have been analysed using inter-retrotransposon amplified polymorphism (IRAP), retrotransposon-microsatellite amplified polymorphism (REMAP), sequence-specific amplification polymorphism (S-SAP), amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP), inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) and simple sequence repeats (SSR). Retrotransposon markers indicated the presence and movement of some Ty3-gypsy and Ty1-copia-elements in almond genome. Since transposable elements are associated with large-scale genome alterations, REMAP produced more reliable phylogenetic inferences than AFLP where homoplasy may affect clustering. In addition, high resolution melting (HRM) analysis was developed to detect SNPs. HRM analysis revealed 1:189 bp frequency of SNPs in exon positions, and the transition-to-transversion proportion was 1.84:1. The low transition bias suggests low methylation levels in almond genome. The polymorphic information content (PIC) was the highest for SSR markers, while SNPs had an average PIC of 0.59, which is close to the values of the rest of the markers. Huge genetic diversity, fragmented population structure and footprints of human selection was confirmed by merging information from all marker strategies. Considering time, cost and performance HRM can be a marker of choice in future studies of Prunus diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.