Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28729328›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2017

Comparative safety of antiepileptic drugs for neurological development in children exposed during pregnancy and breast feeding: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Areti Angeliki Veroniki, Patricia Rios, Elise Cogo, Sharon E Straus, Yaron Finkelstein, Ryan Kealey, Emily Reynen, Charlene Soobiah, Kednapa Thavorn, Brian Hutton and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
34.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 218 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Headache and pregnancy: a systematic review.The journal of headache and pain · 2017
    Pooled it
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Areti Angeliki VeronikiLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Patricia RiosLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Elise CogoLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Sharon E StrausLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Yaron FinkelsteinThe Hospital for Sick Children,555 University Avenue, Toronto, Canada.
Ryan KealeyLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Emily ReynenLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Charlene SoobiahLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Kednapa ThavornSchool of Epidemiology,Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Brian HuttonSchool of Epidemiology,Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Brenda R HemmelgarnDepartments of Medicine and Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Fatemeh YazdiLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Jennifer D'SouzaLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Heather MacDonaldLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
Andrea C TriccoLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CACanada Research Chairs · CAHospital for Sick Children · CAOttawa Hospital · CAOttawa Hospital Research InstitutePublic Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesCompare the safety of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on neurodevelopment of infants/children exposed in utero or during breast feeding. DESIGN AND

settingSystematic review and Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis (NMA). MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched until 27 April 2017. Screening, data abstraction and quality appraisal were completed in duplicate by independent reviewers.

participants29 cohort studies including 5100 infants/children.

interventionsMonotherapy and polytherapy AEDs including first-generation (carbamazepine, clobazam, clonazepam, ethosuximide, phenobarbital, phenytoin, primidone, valproate) and newer-generation (gabapentin, lamotrigine, levetiracetam, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, vigabatrin) AEDs. Epileptic women who did not receive AEDs during pregnancy or breast feeding served as the control group. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Cognitive developmental delay and autism/dyspraxia were primary outcomes. Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, language delay, neonatal seizures, psychomotor developmental delay and social impairment were secondary outcomes.

resultsThe NMA on cognitive developmental delay (11 cohort studies, 933 children, 18 treatments) suggested that among all AEDs only valproate was statistically significantly associated with more children experiencing cognitive developmental delay compared with control (OR=7.40, 95% credible interval (CrI) 3.00 to 18.46). The NMA on autism (5 cohort studies, 2551 children, 12 treatments) suggested that oxcarbazepine (OR 13.51, CrI 1.28 to 221.40), valproate (OR 17.29, 95% CrI 2.40 to 217.60), lamotrigine (OR 8.88, CrI 1.28 to 112.00) and lamotrigine+valproate (OR 132.70, CrI 7.41 to 3851.00) were associated with significantly greater odds of developing autism compared with control. The NMA on psychomotor developmental delay (11 cohort studies, 1145 children, 18 treatments) found that valproate (OR 4.16, CrI 2.04 to 8.75) and carbamazepine+phenobarbital+valproate (OR 19.12, CrI 1.49 to 337.50) were associated with significantly greater odds of psychomotor delay compared with control.

conclusionsValproate alone or combined with another AED is associated with the greatest odds of adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes compared with control. Oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine were associated with increased occurrence of autism. Counselling is advised for women considering pregnancy to tailor the safest regimen. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO database (CRD42014008925).

Indexed as

AnticonvulsantsAutistic DisorderBayes TheoremBreast FeedingCarbamazepineChildEpilepsyFemaleHumansLamotrigineObservational Studies as TopicOxcarbazepinePregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsTriazinesAnticonvulsantsCarbamazepineLamotrigineOxcarbazepineTriazinesValproic Aciddevelopmental delayepilepsyinfantsknowledge synthesismultiple treatment meta-analysispregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28729328
PMCPMC5642793
OpenAlexW2738349700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.