Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28729323›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Gait outcomes of older adults receiving subacute hospital rehabilitation following orthopaedic trauma: a longitudinal cohort study.

Saira A Mathew, Paul Varghese, Suzanne S Kuys, Kristiann C Heesch, Steven M McPhail

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Saira A MathewSchool of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Paul VargheseSchool of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.
Suzanne S KuysSchool of Physiotherapy, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.
Kristiann C HeeschSchool of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.
Steven M McPhailSchool of Public Health and Social Work and Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis study aimed to describe gait speed at admission and discharge from inpatient hospital rehabilitation among older adults recovering from orthopaedic trauma and factors associated with gait speed performance and discharge destination.

designA longitudinal cohort study was conducted.

settingAustralian tertiary hospital subacute rehabilitation wards.

participantsPatients aged ≥60 years recovering from orthopaedic trauma (n=746, 71% female) were eligible for inclusion.

interventionsUsual care (multidisciplinary inpatient hospital rehabilitation). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Gait speed was assessed using the timed 10 m walk test. The proportion of patients exceeding a minimum gait speed threshold indicator (a priori 0.8 m/s) of community ambulation ability was calculated. Generalised linear models were used to examine associations between patient and clinical factors with gait speed performance and being discharged to a residential aged care facility.

resultsAt discharge, 18% of patients (n=135) exceeded the 0.8 m/s threshold indicator for community ambulation ability. Faster gait speed at discharge was found to be associated with being male (B=0.43, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.87), admitted with pelvic (B=0.76, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.37) or multiple fractures (B=1.13, 95% CI 0.25 to 2.01) (vs hip fracture), using no mobility aids (B=-0.93, 95% CI -1.89 to 0.01) and walking at a faster gait speed at admission (B=5.77, 95% CI 5.03 to 6.50). Factors associated with being discharged to residential aged care included older age (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.10), longer length of stay (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.02), having an upper limb fracture (vs hip fracture) (OR 2.81, 95% CI 1.32 to 5.97) and lower Functional Independence Measure cognitive score (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.86 to 0.92).

conclusionsPatients with a range of injury types, not only those presenting to hospital with hip fractures, are being discharged with slow gait speeds that are indicative of limited functional mobility and a high risk of further adverse health events.

Indexed as

GaitLength of StayAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaFemaleFractures, BoneHumansLinear ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMaleOrthopedicsPatient DischargeSex FactorsTertiary Care CentersfallsfractureGaitgeriatricrehabilitationvelocity

Identifiers

PMID28729323
PMCPMC5541473

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.