Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28729322›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Feasibility of a UK community-based, eTherapy mental health service in Greater Manchester: repeated-measures and between-groups study of 'Living Life to the Full Interactive', 'Sleepio' and 'Breaking Free Online' at 'Self Help Services'.

Sarah Elison, Jonathan Ward, Chris Williams, Colin Espie, Glyn Davies, Stephanie Dugdale, Kathryn Ragan, Leanne Chisnall, Nicky Lidbetter, Keith Smith

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Adoption of Digital Therapeutics in Europe.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A Review of Digital Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I Apps): Are They Designed for Engagement?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  12. Non-pharmacological Approaches for Management of Insomnia.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarah ElisonBreaking Free Group, Manchester, UK.
Jonathan WardBreaking Free Group, Manchester, UK.
Chris WilliamsInstitute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, UK.
Colin EspieNuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, UK.
Glyn DaviesBreaking Free Group, Manchester, UK.
Stephanie DugdaleBreaking Free Group, Manchester, UK.
Kathryn RaganSelf Help Services, UK.
Leanne ChisnallSelf Help Services, UK.
Nicky LidbetterSelf Help Services, UK.
Keith SmithSelf Help Services, UK.
University of Glasgow · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThere is increasing evidence to support the effectiveness of eTherapies for mental health, although limited data have been reported from community-based services. Therefore, this service evaluation reports on feasibility and outcomes from an eTherapy mental health service.

setting'Self Help Services', an Increasing Access to Psychological Therapies (IAPT) eTherapy service in Greater Manchester.

participants1068 service users referred to the service for secondary care for their mental health difficulties.

interventionsParticipants were triaged into one of three eTherapy programmes: 'Living Life to the Full Interactive' for low mood, stress and anxiety; 'Sleepio' for insomnia; and 'Breaking Free Online' for substance misuse, depending on clinical need. PRIMARY OUTCOMES MEASURES: Standardised psychometric assessments of depression, anxiety and social functioning, collected as part of the IAPT Minimum Data Set, were conducted at baseline and post-treatment.

resultsData indicated baseline differences, with the Breaking Free Online group having higher scores for depression and anxiety than the Living Life to the Full Interactive (depression CI 1.27 to 3.21, p<0.0001; anxiety CI 077 to 1.72, p<0.0001) and Sleepio (depression CI 1.19 to 4.52, p<0.0001; anxiety CI 2.16 to 5.23, p<0.0001) groups. Promising improvements in mental health scores were found within all three groups (all p<0.0001), as were significant reductions in numbers of service users reaching clinical threshold scores for mental health difficulties (p<0.0001). Number of days of engagement was not related to change from baseline for the Living Life to the Full or Sleepio programmes but was associated with degree of change for Breaking Free Online.

conclusionData presented provide evidence for feasibility of this eTherapy delivery model in supporting service users with a range of mental health difficulties and suggest that eTherapies may be a useful addition to treatment offering in community-based services.

Indexed as

Community Mental Health ServicesInternetMental HealthAdultFemaleHumansMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedRegression AnalysisTreatment OutcomeUnited Kingdomcognitive-behavioural therapyeTherapiesmental healthservice evaluationsleep medicinesubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID28729322
PMCPMC5541623
OpenAlexW2737654419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.