Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28729311›Full record

Trial reportBMJ open2017

A review of rate control in atrial fibrillation, and the rationale and protocol for the RATE-AF trial.

Dipak Kotecha, Melanie Calvert, Jonathan J Deeks, Michael Griffith, Paulus Kirchhof, Gregory Yh Lip, Samir Mehta, Gemma Slinn, Mary Stanbury, Richard P Steeds and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IVMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02391337 (Evaluating Different Rate Control Therapies in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02391337 phase4completednot on this map

Evaluating Different Rate Control Therapies in Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective, Randomised, Open-label, Blinded Endpoint Feasibility Pilot Comparing Digoxin and Beta-blockers as Initial Rate Control Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BirminghamRan2016 to 2019Enrolled161ConditionsPermanent Atrial FibrillationArmsBisoprolol, Digoxin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. 2025 Thai guideline for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. European Society of Cardiology smartphone and tablet applications for patients with atrial fibrillation and their health care providers.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2018
    Review
  20. Benefits of prescribing low-dose digoxin in atrial fibrillation.International journal of immunopathology and pharmacology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dipak KotechaInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2570-9812
Melanie CalvertCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1856-837X
Jonathan J DeeksInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Michael GriffithCardiology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Paulus KirchhofInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1881-0197
Gregory Yh LipInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Samir MehtaBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Gemma SlinnBirmingham Clinical Trials Unit, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Mary Stanbury(Lead for the Patient and Public Involvement panel), Birmingham, UK.
Richard P SteedsInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jonathan N TownendInstitute of Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBCancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit · GBSandwell & West Birmingham Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

Department of Health CDF-2015-08-074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveAtrial fibrillation (AF) is common and causes impaired quality of life, an increased risk of stroke and death as well as frequent hospital admissions. The majority of patients with AF require control of heart rate. In this article , we summarise the limited evidence from clinical trials that guides prescription, and present the rationale and protocol for a new randomised trial. As rate control has not yet been shown to reduce mortality, there is a clear need to compare the impact of therapy on quality of life, cardiac function and exercise capacity. Such a trial should concentrate on the long-term effects of treatment in the largest proportion of patients with AF, those with symptomatic permanent AF, with the aim of improving patient well-being. DESIGN AND

interventionThe RAte control Therapy Evaluation in permanent Atrial Fibrillation (RATE-AF) trial will enrol 160 participants with a prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded end point design comparing initial rate control with digoxin or bisoprolol. This will be the first head-to-head randomised trial of digoxin and beta-blockers in AF.

participantsRecruited patients will be aged ≥60 years with permanent AF and symptoms of breathlessness (equivalent to New York Heart Association class II or above), with few exclusion criteria to maximise generalisability to routine clinical practice. OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is patient-reported quality of life, with secondary outcomes including echocardiographic ventricular function, exercise capacity and biomarkers of cellular and clinical response. Follow-up will occur at 6 and 12 months, with feasibility components to inform the design of a future trial powered to detect a difference in hospital admission. The RATE-AF trial will underpin an integrated approach to management including biomarkers, functions and symptoms that will guide future research into optimal, personalised rate control in patients with AF. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: East Midlands-Derby Research Ethics Committee (16/EM/0178); peer-reviewed publications.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov: NCT02391337; ISRCTN: 95259705. Pre-results.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAgedAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsAtrial FibrillationBisoprololDigoxinFemaleHeart FailureHeart RateHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality of LifeResearch DesignAdrenergic beta-1 Receptor AntagonistsAnti-Arrhythmia AgentsBisoprololDigoxinatrial fibrillationEchocardiographyheart rateProtocols & guidelinesquality of lifeRATE-AF

Identifiers

PMID28729311
PMCPMC5588987
OpenAlexW2737366920

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.