Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28728992›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of urology2018

Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for High Risk, Nonmetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: An Analysis of the ASSURE (ECOG-ACRIN 2805) Adjuvant Trial.

Benjamin T Ristau, Judi Manola, Naomi B Haas, Daniel Y C Heng, Edward M Messing, Christopher G Wood, Christopher J Kane, Robert S DiPaola, Robert G Uzzo

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of urology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Perioperative Therapy in Renal Cell Carcinoma: What Do We Know, What Have We Learned, What's Next?Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2018
    Review
  18. A Festschrift in Honor of Edward M. Messing, MD, FACS.Bladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 9 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin T RistauFox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: benristaumd@gmail.com.
Judi ManolaECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
Naomi B HaasAbramson Cancer Center of University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Daniel Y C HengTom Baker Cancer Center, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Edward M MessingDepartment of Urology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York.
Christopher G WoodUniversity of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Christopher J KaneMoores Cancer Center, University of California-San Diego, La Jolla, California.
Robert S DiPaolaRutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Robert G UzzoFox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USMoores Cancer CenterRutgers Cancer Institute of New JerseyTemple University Health System · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversity of Calgary · CAUniversity of Pennsylvania · USUniversity of Rochester · US

Funding

Member Site CoreU10CA180821 · NCI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Evanthia Galanis · 2014 to 2026
$177.3M
Project-006U10CA180820 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI Peter J ODwyer, MITCHELL D. SCHNALL · 2014 to 2026
$167.6M
SWOG Network Group Operations Center of the NCTNU10CA180888 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI PRIMO N. LARA · 2014 to 2026
$152.1M
Statistics CoreU10CA180794 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI PAUL J CATALANO, CONSTANTINE A. GATSONIS · 2014 to 2026
$111.2M
ECOG-ACRIN Biospecimen Bank to Support NCTNU24CA196172 · NCI · ECOG-ACRIN MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI STANLEY R. HAMILTON, Scott D Jewell · 2015 to 2026
$41.1M
NCIC Clinical Trials Group - Canadian Collaborating Clinical Trials NetworkU10CA180863 · NCI · QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY AT KINGSTON · PI Janet Ellen Dancey · 2014 to 2026
$40.4M
UT MD Anderson Cancer Center Network Lead Academic Participating Site (LAP)U10CA180858 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI HUNT, KELLY K, PINNIX, CHELSEA CAMILLE · 2014 to 2018
$5.6M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180794NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180820NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180821NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180858NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180863NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180888NCI NIH HHS U24 CA196172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLymphadenectomy is a well established practice for many urological malignancies but its role in renal cell carcinoma is less clear. Our primary objective was to determine whether lymphadenectomy impacted survival in patients with fully resected, high risk renal cell carcinoma. MATERIALS AND

methodsPatients with fully resected, high risk, nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma were randomized to adjuvant sorafenib, sunitinib or placebo in the ASSURE (Adjuvant Sorafenib and Sunitinib for Unfavorable Renal Carcinoma) trial. Lymphadenectomy was performed for cN+ disease or at surgeon discretion. Patients treated with lymphadenectomy were compared to patients in the trial who did not undergo lymphadenectomy. The primary outcome was overall survival associated with lymphadenectomy. Secondary outcomes were disease free survival, factors associated with performing lymphadenectomy and surgical complications.

resultsOf the 1,943 patients in ASSURE 701 (36.1%) underwent lymphadenectomy, including all resectable patients with cN+ and 30.1% of those with cN0 disease. A median of 3 lymph nodes (IQR 1-8) were removed and the rate of pN+ disease in the lymphadenectomy group was 23.4%. There was no overall survival benefit for lymphadenectomy relative to no lymphadenectomy (HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.93-1.39, p = 0.20). In patients with pN+ disease who underwent lymphadenectomy no improvement in overall or disease-free survival was observed for adjuvant therapy relative to placebo. Lymphadenectomy did not confer an increased risk of surgical complications (14.2% vs 13.4%, p = 0.63).

conclusionsThe benefit of lymphadenectomy in patients undergoing surgery for high risk renal cell carcinoma remains uncertain. Future strategies to answer this question should include a prospective trial in which patients with high risk renal cell carcinoma are randomized to specific lymphadenectomy templates.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsCarcinoma, Renal CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKidney NeoplasmsLymph Node ExcisionMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingNephrectomyRiskAntineoplastic AgentsSorafenibSunitinibadjuvantcarcinomachemotherapykidneylymph node excisionmortalityrenal cell

Identifiers

PMID28728992
PMCPMC5800986
OpenAlexW2735873808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.