Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28728675›Full record

ArticleBiological psychiatry2018

Increased Striatal Dopamine Synthesis Capacity in Gambling Addiction.

Ruth J van Holst, Guillaume Sescousse, Lieneke K Janssen, Marcel Janssen, Anne S Berry, William J Jagust, Roshan Cools

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biological psychiatry, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
24.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Similarities and Differences in Neurobiology.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Attenuated Directed Exploration during Reinforcement Learning in Gambling Disorder.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruth J van HolstDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center-University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: mail@ruthvanholst.nl.
Guillaume SescousseDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lieneke K JanssenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marcel JanssenDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anne S BerryHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
William J JagustHelen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California.
Roshan CoolsDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLUniversity of California, Berkeley · USAcademic Medical Center · NLRadboud University Medical Center · NL

Funding

Aging Brain, Cognition, and DopamineR01AG044292 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI JAGUST, WILLIAM J. · 2013 to 2017
$3.6M
Dopaminergic modulation of networks mediating cognitive flexibility in older adulF32AG047686 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI BERRY, ANNE SHIVELY · 2014 to 2016
$158k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG047686NIA NIH HHS R01 AG044292
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe hypothesis that dopamine plays an important role in the pathophysiology of pathological gambling is pervasive. However, there is little to no direct evidence for a categorical difference between pathological gamblers and healthy control subjects in terms of dopamine transmission in a drug-free state. Here we provide evidence for this hypothesis by comparing dopamine synthesis capacity in the dorsal and ventral parts of the striatum in 13 pathological gamblers and 15 healthy control subjects.

methodsThis was achieved using [

resultsOur results show that dopamine synthesis capacity was increased in pathological gamblers compared with healthy control subjects. Dopamine synthesis was 16% higher in the caudate body, 17% higher in the dorsal putamen, and 17% higher in the ventral striatum in pathological gamblers compared with control subjects. Moreover, dopamine synthesis capacity in the dorsal putamen and caudate head was positively correlated with gambling distortions in pathological gamblers.

conclusionsTaken together, these results provide empirical evidence for increased striatal dopamine synthesis in pathological gambling.

Indexed as

AdultBrain MappingCorpus StriatumDihydroxyphenylalanineDopamineDopamine AgentsFemaleFluorine RadioisotopesGamblingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesDihydroxyphenylalanineDopamineDopamine AgentsFluorine-18Fluorine Radioisotopes[(18)F]DOPAAddictionDopamineGamblingNeuroimagingReward

Identifiers

PMID28728675
PMCPMC6698370
OpenAlexW2695330985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.