Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28728537›Full record

ArticleInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences2017

Super-selective coil embolization of a basilar perforator artery aneurysm previously treated by the stent-in-stent technique, using an extremely soft bare coil delivered through a one-marker microcatheter.

Yves Chau, Marina Sachet, Jacques Sédat

Open access · greenAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Endovascular electrothrombosis: A promising alternative for basilar artery perforator aneurysm treatment.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yves ChauCentre Hospitalier, Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Marina SachetCentre Hospitalier, Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Jacques SédatCentre Hospitalier, Universitaire de Nice, Nice, France.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Aneurysms of the perforating arteries arising from the basilar artery trunk are rare and represent a therapeutic challenge. Methods A basilar perforator aneurysm was initially treated by the stent-in-stent technique. Enlargement of the aneurysm was seen on follow up and the sac was secondarily coiled using two extremely soft bare coils, delivered through a one-marker microcatheter. Results At 6 months, the patient had a modified Rankin Scale score of 0 and cerebral arteriography demonstrated complete occlusion of the lesion. Conclusions We describe, as far as we are aware, the first case of basilar perforator aneurysm occlusion using extremely soft bare coils, inserted through the mesh of two stents previously placed in the basilar trunk.

Indexed as

StentsCerebral AngiographyContrast MediaEmbolization, TherapeuticHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalIntracranial AneurysmMaleMiddle AgedTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeContrast MediaBasilar arteryendovascular coil embolizationperforator aneurysmstent

Identifiers

PMID28728537
PMCPMC5624417
OpenAlexW2737394287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.