Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28728162›Full record

ArticleActa haematologica2017

Realistic Lenalidomide Dose Adjustment Strategy for Transplant-Ineligible Elderly Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Japanese Real-World Experience.

Aya Nakaya, Shinya Fujita, Atsushi Satake, Takahisa Nakanishi, Yoshiko Azuma, Yukie Tsubokura, Masaaki Hotta, Hideaki Yoshimura, Kazuyoshi Ishii, Tomoki Ito and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta haematologica, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Time-to-Treatment-Failure and Related Outcomes Among 1000+ Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients: Comparisons Between Older Versus Younger Patients (Alliance A151711).Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer · 2018
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Aya NakayaFirst Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan.
Shinya Fujita
Atsushi Satake
Takahisa Nakanishi
Yoshiko Azuma
Yukie Tsubokura
Masaaki Hotta
Hideaki Yoshimura
Kazuyoshi Ishii
Tomoki Ito
Shosaku Nomura

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug administered orally in the treatment of multiple myeloma. Some elderly patients require a reduced lenalidomide dose because of comorbidities and/or adverse events. This study investigated the actual dose of lenalidomide in elderly patients, finding that most received reduced (5-10 mg) doses. The most common reasons for dose reduction were renal dysfunction (54% of patients), fatigue (grade ≥3; 20%), hematologic disorder (grade ≥3; 14%), and rash (grade ≥3; 9%). Their median time to progression was 11.8 months and their median overall survival was 39.2 months. The overall response rate was 73%, including 17% with a complete response, 19% with a very good partial response, and 37% with a partial response. These results showed that, contrary to western countries, most patients were treated with a reduced dose of lenalidomide in Japan. However, it is suggested that continued treatment with a tolerable dose may yield favorable outcomes.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overDexamethasoneFemaleHumansImmunologic FactorsJapanLenalidomideMaleMultiple MyelomaThalidomideDexamethasoneImmunologic FactorsLenalidomideThalidomideElderlyLenalidomideReduced doseRelapsed/refractory multiple myelomaTransplant ineligibility

Identifiers

PMID28728162
PMCPMC5872556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.