Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28728139›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2017

A Longitudinal Analysis of the Influence of the Neighborhood Environment on Recreational Walking within the Neighborhood: Results from RESIDE.

Hayley Christian, Matthew Knuiman, Mark Divitini, Sarah Foster, Paula Hooper, Bryan Boruff, Fiona Bull, Billie Giles-Corti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Impact of Different Greenspace Metrics on Cardiovascular Disease Incidence in Urban Settings: A Comparative Analysis.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Hayley ChristianSchool of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Matthew KnuimanSchool of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Mark DivitiniSchool of Population Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Sarah FosterCentre for the Built Environment and Health, School of Earth and Environment & School of Sports Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Paula HooperCentre for the Built Environment and Health, School of Earth and Environment & School of Sports Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Bryan BoruffCentre for the Built Environment and Health, School of Earth and Environment & School of Sports Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Fiona BullCentre for the Built Environment and Health, School of Earth and Environment & School of Sports Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
Billie Giles-CortiCentre for the Built Environment and Health, School of Earth and Environment & School of Sports Science, Exercise and Health, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is limited longitudinal evidence confirming the role of neighborhood environment attributes in encouraging people to walk more or if active people simply choose to live in activity-friendly neighborhoods. Natural experiments of policy changes to create more walkable communities provide stronger evidence for a causal effect of neighborhood environments on residents' walking.

objectivesWe aimed to investigate longitudinal associations between objective and perceived neighborhood environment measures and neighborhood recreational walking.

methodsWe analyzed longitudinal data collected over 8 yr (four surveys) from the RESIDential Environments (RESIDE) Study (Perth, Australia, 2003-2012). At each time point, participants reported the frequency and total minutes of recreational walking/week within their neighborhood and neighborhood environment perceptions. Objective measures of the neighborhood environment were generated using a Geographic Information System (GIS).

resultsLocal recreational walking was influenced by objectively measured access to a medium-/large-size park, beach access, and higher street connectivity, which was reduced when adjusted for neighborhood perceptions. In adjusted models, positive perceptions of access to a park and beach, higher street connectivity, neighborhood esthetics, and safety from crime were independent determinants of increased neighborhood recreational walking. Local recreational walking increased by 9 min/wk (12% increase in frequency) for each additional perceived neighborhood attribute present.

conclusionsOur findings provide urban planners and policy makers with stronger causal evidence of the positive impact of well-connected neighborhoods and access to local parks of varying sizes on local residents' recreational walking and health. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP823.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedRecreationResidence CharacteristicsWalkingWestern Australia

Identifiers

PMID28728139
PMCPMC5744655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.