Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28728045›Full record

Observational studyEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2017

Postdiagnosis neurological care for patients with psychogenic nonepileptic spells (PNES).

Chloe E Hill, Hannah Schwartz, Nabila Dahodwala, Brian Litt, Kathryn A Davis

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chloe E HillDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: chloe.hill@uphs.upenn.edu.
Hannah SchwartzDepartment of Biology, Emory University, 201 Dowman Drive, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Nabila DahodwalaDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Brian LittDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Kathryn A DavisDepartment of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
University of Pennsylvania · USEmory University · US

Funding

Neurologic Clinical Epidemiology Training ProgramT32NS061779 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Andrea Lauren Christman Schneider, Allison Willis · 2008 to 2026
$4.6M
Localizing epileptic networks using novel 7T MRI glutamate imagingK23NS092973 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVIS, KATHRYN ADAMIAK · 2016 to 2020
$980k
NINDS NIH HHS K23 NS092973NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061779
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study investigated continuity of neurological care for patients discharged from the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) with a diagnosis of psychogenic nonepileptic spells (PNES). Because PNES are seizure-like episodes that cannot be explained by abnormal electrical brain activity, they are challenging for patients to understand and accept. Consequently, after diagnosis, patients commonly fail to start recommended psychotherapy and instead pursue redundant medical care. As consistent relationships with healthcare providers may help, we instituted standard follow-up for patients diagnosed with PNES.

methodsWe performed a retrospective observational cohort study of adults diagnosed with PNES in our EMU. In November 2013, we began routine scheduling of postdischarge follow-up neurology appointments. We compared preintervention (November 2010-October 2013) and postintervention (November 2013-May 2016) cohorts with regard to clinic attendance, understanding the diagnosis, compliance with recommendations, and event frequency.

resultsWe identified 55 patients in the preintervention cohort and 123 patients in the postintervention cohort. We successfully implemented the intended practice changes; more patients had follow-up scheduled by discharge (preintervention 2% vs. postintervention 36%, p<0.001), time to follow-up decreased (46days vs. 29, p=0.001), and providers more consistently queried understanding of diagnosis (38% vs. 67%, p=0.03). Explicit planning for continued care did not produce the anticipated patient-provider relationships, as follow-up in clinic was low (38% vs. 37%). For patients who attended clinic, the intervention did not improve establishment of psychiatric care, compliance with medication recommendations, understanding of diagnosis, or event frequency. The odds of reduced event frequency were nonsignificantly increased with understanding the diagnosis (OR 3.75, p=0.14). Recommending antiepileptic drug (AED) discontinuation was associated with increased odds of event freedom (OR 6.91, p<0.01). SIGNIFICANCE: Scheduling follow-up for patients diagnosed with PNES did not facilitate ongoing patient-provider relationships due to poor clinic attendance. As follow-up is unreliable, the inpatient visit is a critical window of opportunity for intervention.

Indexed as

AdultAftercareCohort StudiesContinuity of Patient CareElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeurologyPatient CompliancePatient DischargePsychophysiologic DisordersRetrospective StudiesSeizuresYoung AdultEpilepsy monitoring unitPsychogenic nonepileptic spellsTransitions of care

Identifiers

PMID28728045
PMCPMC5568679
OpenAlexW2735279312

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.