ArticleJournal of women's health (2002)2018
A Collaborative, Network-Based Approach to Advance Women's Depression Research in the United States: Preliminary Findings.
Article in Journal of women's health (2002), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical correlates of women endorsing premenstrual suicidal ideation: a cross-sectional study.BioPsychoSocial medicine · 2022Article
- Symptoms of maternal psychological distress during pregnancy: sex-specific effects for neonatal morbidity.Journal of perinatal medicine · 2022Article
- Maternal Interaction With Infants Among Women at Elevated Risk for Postpartum Depression.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Maternal depressive symptoms, poverty, and young motherhood increase the odds of early depressive and anxiety disorders for children born prematurely.Infant mental health journal · 2021Article
- Change in Health-Related Socioeconomic Risk Factors and Mental Health During the Early Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A National Survey of U.S. Women.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTranslation of women's mental health research has yet to impact overall prevalence and burden of Mood Disorders in the United States. The lack of standard measures and methodological coordination across studies has contributed to the slow impact of research on outcomes. The primary aims of this project were to demonstrate the process by which multiple investigators, sites, and settings administered a standard women's mental health questionnaire within a new Women's Depression Network. Information on the prevalence of mental health and service use across sites is provided.
methodsA standard women's mental health questionnaire was developed and administered across seven different women's health sites in the United States. Validated measures of depression and anxiety were included (Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale [PHQ-9] and Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale [GAD-7]). Administration of the questionnaire was embedded into existing clinical or research activities at each site.
resultsData from 1,316 women were collected from seven sites over 12 months. A total of 14% and 15% of the women scored at or above the cutoff on the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 respectively. Just over half of the women screening positive for either depression or anxiety reported current treatment use.
conclusionsFindings suggest that coordination and administration of a standard women's mental health questionnaire is feasible across multiple settings and sites. Results highlight a low percentage of treatment use across various settings. The infrastructure developed for this study sets the stage for hypothesis-driven studies that can facilitate coordinated, network-based research that has the potential to accelerate advances in the field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.