Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28727788›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Oecomys catherinae (Sigmodontinae, Cricetidae): Evidence for chromosomal speciation?

Stella Miranda Malcher, Julio Cesar Pieczarka, Lena Geise, Rogério Vieira Rossi, Adenilson Leão Pereira, Patricia Caroline Mary O'Brien, Paulo Henrique Asfora, Victor Fonsêca da Silva, Maria Iracilda Sampaio, Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-Smith and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. A Cryptic Subterranean Mammal Species, the Lesser Blind Mole Rat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Cryptic Diversity of the European Blind Mole RatAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  7. New karyotype forEcology and evolution · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Stella Miranda MalcherCentro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, Laboratório de Citogenética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Julio Cesar PieczarkaCentro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, Laboratório de Citogenética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Lena GeiseDepartamento de Zoologia, Laboratório de Mastozoologia, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Rogério Vieira RossiInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brasil.
Adenilson Leão PereiraCentro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, Laboratório de Citogenética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.
Patricia Caroline Mary O'BrienCambridge Resource Center for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Paulo Henrique AsforaDepartamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, Brasil.
Victor Fonsêca da SilvaInstituto de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brasil.
Maria Iracilda SampaioLaboratório de Genética e Biologia Molecular, Universidade Federal do Pará, Campus Universitário de Bragança, Bragança, Pará, Brasil.
Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-SmithCambridge Resource Center for Comparative Genomics, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Cleusa Yoshiko NagamachiCentro de Estudos Avançados da Biodiversidade, Laboratório de Citogenética, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brasil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1516-2734
Universidade Federal do Pará · BRUniversidade Federal de Mato Grosso · BRUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BRUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the Oryzomyini (Sigmodontinae), Oecomys is the most speciose, with 17 species. This genus presents high karyotypic diversity (2n = 54 to 2n = 86) and many taxonomic issues at the species level because of the presence of cryptic species and the overlap of morphological characters. For these reasons the real number of species of Oecomys may be underestimated. With the aim of verifying if the taxon Oecomys catherinae is composed of more than one species, we made comparative studies on two populations from two regions of Brazil, one from the Amazon and another from the Atlantic Forest using both classical cytogenetics (G- and C-banding) and comparative genomic mapping with whole chromosome probes of Hylaeamys megacephalus (HME), molecular data (cytochrome b mitochondrial DNA) and morphology. Our results confirm that Oecomys catherinae occurs in the southeast Amazon, and reveal a new karyotype for the species (2n = 62, FNa = 62). The comparative genomic analysis with HME probes identified chromosomal homeologies between both populations and rearrangements that are responsible for the different karyotypes. We compared our results in Sigmodontinae genera with other studies that also used HME probes. These chromosomal differences together with the absence of consistent differentiation between the two populations on morphological and molecular analyses suggest that these populations may represent cryptic species.

Indexed as

AnimalsArvicolinaeBrazilChromosome PaintingChromosomes, MammalianFemaleIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypeKaryotypingMalePhylogenySigmodontinaeSpecies Specificity

Identifiers

PMID28727788
PMCPMC5519095
OpenAlexW2739157016

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.