ArticlePloS one2017
A comparative study of patients' activities and interactions in a stroke unit before and after reconstruction-The significance of the built environment.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Influences on the physical activity behaviour of inpatients after stroke outside of staff-led rehabilitation sessions: a systematic review.Clinical rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Built environments for inpatient stroke rehabilitation services and care: a systematic literature review.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Virtual reality environmental enrichment effects on heart rate variability in healthy volunteers.Psychopharmacology · 2026Article
- The effects of virtual reality environmental enrichments on craving to food in healthy volunteers.Psychopharmacology · 2024Article
- Built Environments to Support Rehabilitation for People With Stroke From the Hospital to the Home (B-Sure): Protocol for a Mixed Method Participatory Co-Design Study.JMIR research protocols · 2023Article
- The role of the physical environment in stroke recovery: Evidence-based design principles from a mixed-methods multiple case study.PloS one · 2023Article
- Article
- Why hospital design matters: A narrative review of built environments research relevant to stroke care.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2022Review
- Does the physical environment matter? - A qualitative study of healthcare professionals' experiences of newly built stroke units.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2021Article
- Effects of the Cytoplasm and Mitochondrial Specific Hydroxyl Radical Scavengers TA293 and mitoTA293 in Bleomycin-Induced Pulmonary Fibrosis Model Mice.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Patients' physical activity in stroke units in Latvia and Sweden.Brain and behavior · 2021Observational
- Article
- Article
- "It's Lonely": Patients' Experiences of the Physical Environment at a Newly Built Stroke Unit.HERD · 2019Article
- Is Environmental Enrichment Ready for Clinical Application in Human Post-stroke Rehabilitation?Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2018Article
- Developments in hybrid operating room, neurointensive care unit, and ward composition and organization for stroke management.Brain circulationReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early mobilization and rehabilitation, multidisciplinary stroke expertise and comprehensive therapies are fundamental in a stroke unit. To achieve effective and safe stroke care, the physical environment in modern stroke units should facilitate the delivery of evidence-based care. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to explore patients' activities and interactions in a stroke unit before the reconstruction of the physical environment, while in a temporary location and after reconstruction. This case study examined a stroke unit as an integrated whole. The data were collected using a behavioral mapping technique at three different time points: in the original unit, in the temporary unit and in the new unit. A total of 59 patients were included. The analysis included field notes from observations of the physical environment and examples from planning and design documents. The findings indicated that in the new unit, the patients spent more time in their rooms, were less active, and had fewer interactions with staff and family than the patients in the original unit. The reconstruction involved a change from a primarily multi-bed room design to single-room accommodations. In the new unit, the patients' lounge was located in a far corner of the unit with a smaller entrance than the patients' lounge in the old unit, which was located at the end of a corridor with a noticeable entrance. Changes in the design of the stroke unit may have influenced the patients' activities and interactions. This study raises the question of how the physical environment should be designed in the future to facilitate the delivery of health care and improve outcomes for stroke patients. This research is based on a case study, and although the results should be interpreted with caution, we strongly recommend that environmental considerations be included in future stroke guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.