Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28727629›Full record

Trial reportJournal of clinical gastroenterology2018

An Automated Inpatient Split-dose Bowel Preparation System Improves Colonoscopy Quality and Reduces Repeat Procedures.

Rena Yadlapati, Elyse R Johnston, Adam B Gluskin, Dyanna L Gregory, Rachel Cyrus, Lindsay Werth, Jody D Ciolino, David P Grande, Rajesh N Keswani

Abstract readPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of clinical gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rena YadlapatiNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Elyse R JohnstonUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA.
Adam B GluskinNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Dyanna L GregoryNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Rachel CyrusNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Lindsay WerthNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Jody D CiolinoNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
David P GrandeNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Rajesh N KeswaniNorthwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL.
Northwestern University · USUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center · US

Funding

Training Grant in Gastrointestinal Physiology and PsychologyT32DK101363 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI PANDOLFINO, JOHN E · 2014 to 2018
$1.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK101363
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background/goalsInpatient colonoscopy preparations are often inadequate, compromising patient safety and procedure quality, while resulting in greater hospital costs. The aims of this study were to: (1) design and implement an electronic inpatient split-dose bowel preparation order set; (2) assess the intervention's impact upon preparation adequacy, repeated colonoscopies, hospital days, and costs. STUDY: We conducted a single center prospective pragmatic quasiexperimental study of hospitalized adults undergoing colonoscopy. The experimental intervention was designed using DMAIC (define, measure, analyze, improve, and control) methodology. Prospective data collected over 12 months were compared with data from a historical preintervention cohort. The primary outcome was bowel preparation quality and secondary outcomes included number of repeated procedures, hospital days, and costs.

resultsOn the basis of a Delphi method and DMAIC process, we created an electronic inpatient bowel preparation order set inclusive of a split-dose bowel preparation algorithm, automated orders for rescue medications, and nursing bowel preparation checks. The analysis data set included 969 patients, 445 (46%) in the postintervention group. The adequacy of bowel preparation significantly increased following intervention (86% vs. 43%; P<0.01) and proportion of repeated procedures decreased (2.0% vs. 4.6%; P=0.03). Mean hospital days from bowel preparation initiation to discharge decreased from 8.0 to 6.9 days (P=0.02). The intervention resulted in an estimated 1-year cost-savings of $46,076 based on a reduction in excess hospital days associated with repeated and delayed procedures.

conclusionsOur interdisciplinary initiative targeting inpatient colonoscopy preparations significantly improved quality and reduced repeat procedures, and hospital days. Other institutions should consider utilizing this framework to improve inpatient colonoscopy value.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCatharticsColonoscopyFemaleHospital CostsHumansInpatientsLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesQuality ImprovementReoperationCathartics

Identifiers

PMID28727629
PMCPMC5775057
OpenAlexW2738044063

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.