Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28727517›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2017

Comparative Toxicity and Effectiveness of Trastuzumab-Based Chemotherapy Regimens in Older Women With Early-Stage Breast Cancer.

Katherine E Reeder-Hayes, Anne Marie Meyer, Sharon Peacock Hinton, Ke Meng, Lisa A Carey, Stacie B Dusetzina

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Updated Overview of the SEER-Medicare Data: Enhanced Content and Applications.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Therapy-related acute myeloid leukemia and its prevention.American journal of blood research · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Progress in adjuvant systemic therapy for breast cancer.Nature reviews. Clinical oncology · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Katherine E Reeder-HayesKatherine E. Reeder-Hayes, Anne Marie Meyer, Sharon Peacock Hinton, Ke Meng, Lisa A. Carey, and Stacie B. Dusetzina, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Ke Meng, UNC Lineberger Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Lisa A. Carey, UNC School of Medicine; and Stacie B. Dusetzina, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, and UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Anne Marie MeyerKatherine E. Reeder-Hayes, Anne Marie Meyer, Sharon Peacock Hinton, Ke Meng, Lisa A. Carey, and Stacie B. Dusetzina, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Ke Meng, UNC Lineberger Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Lisa A. Carey, UNC School of Medicine; and Stacie B. Dusetzina, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, and UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Sharon Peacock HintonKatherine E. Reeder-Hayes, Anne Marie Meyer, Sharon Peacock Hinton, Ke Meng, Lisa A. Carey, and Stacie B. Dusetzina, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Ke Meng, UNC Lineberger Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Lisa A. Carey, UNC School of Medicine; and Stacie B. Dusetzina, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, and UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Ke MengKatherine E. Reeder-Hayes, Anne Marie Meyer, Sharon Peacock Hinton, Ke Meng, Lisa A. Carey, and Stacie B. Dusetzina, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Ke Meng, UNC Lineberger Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Lisa A. Carey, UNC School of Medicine; and Stacie B. Dusetzina, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, and UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Lisa A CareyKatherine E. Reeder-Hayes, Anne Marie Meyer, Sharon Peacock Hinton, Ke Meng, Lisa A. Carey, and Stacie B. Dusetzina, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Ke Meng, UNC Lineberger Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Lisa A. Carey, UNC School of Medicine; and Stacie B. Dusetzina, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, and UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Stacie B DusetzinaKatherine E. Reeder-Hayes, Anne Marie Meyer, Sharon Peacock Hinton, Ke Meng, Lisa A. Carey, and Stacie B. Dusetzina, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Ke Meng, UNC Lineberger Integrated Cancer Information and Surveillance System; Katherine E. Reeder-Hayes and Lisa A. Carey, UNC School of Medicine; and Stacie B. Dusetzina, Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, and UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC.
Marie Curie · GB

Funding

Virology Research Program (Program 4)P30CA016086 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI David Darr · 1985 to 2026
$201.5M
Tissue Procurement & PathologyP50CA058223 · NCI · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI CHARLES M PEROU · 1992 to 2026
$59.3M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
CALIFORNIA COORDINATED CANCER PREVENTION & CONTROL PROGRAMU58DP003862 · DP · CALIFORNIA STATE DEPT OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI SNIPES, KURT P · 2012 to 2014
$31.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCCDPHP CDC HHS U58 DP003862NCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000034CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000035CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000035INCI NIH HHS HHSN261201000140CNCI NIH HHS P30 CA016086NCI NIH HHS P50 CA058223
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose The combination of chemotherapy and trastuzumab is the standard of care for adjuvant treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer. Two regimens have been widely adopted in the United States: doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, paclitaxel, and trastuzumab (ACTH) and docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH). No head-to-head comparison of these regimens has been conducted in a clinical trial, and existing trial data have limited generalizability to older patients. Methods We used SEER-Medicare data from 2005 to 2013 to compare outcomes of ACTH versus TCH among patients age older than 65 years. Propensity score matching was used to balance cohort characteristics between treatment arms. Outcomes included toxicity-related hospitalization, survival, and trastuzumab completion. Data from 1,077 patients receiving ACTH or TCH were analyzed, and the propensity-matched subsample included 416 women. Results There was a significant shift toward TCH over time, with 88% of patients receiving ACTH in 2005 compared with 15% by 2011. Among propensity score-matched patients, we found no difference between regimens in health care use overall or for chemotherapy-related adverse events (ACTH, 34% v TCH, 36.5%; P = .46). Patients receiving TCH were significantly more likely to complete trastuzumab (89% v 77%; P = .001). There was no difference in 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (ACTH, 92% v TCH, 96%; hazard ratio, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.90 to 4.82) or overall survival. Conclusion Among a matched sample of older patients, ACTH compared with TCH was not associated with a higher rate of serious adverse events or hospitalizations, but it was associated with less completion of adjuvant trastuzumab. We did not detect a difference in 5-year survival outcomes for ACTH compared with TCH. In the context of limited evidence in older patients, selection between these two regimens on the basis of concerns about differential toxicity or efficacy may not be appropriate.

Indexed as

Administrative Claims, HealthcareAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBreast NeoplasmsCarboplatinComparative Effectiveness ResearchCyclophosphamideDatabases, FactualDisease-Free SurvivalDocetaxelDoxorubicinFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMedicareMultivariate AnalysisCarboplatinCyclophosphamideDocetaxelDoxorubicinPaclitaxelTaxoidsTrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID28727517
PMCPMC5652869
OpenAlexW2738336818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.