Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28727221›Full record

ArticleWound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society2017

Scar formation following excisional and burn injuries in a red Duroc pig model.

Britani N Blackstone, Jayne Y Kim, Kevin L McFarland, Chandan K Sen, Dorothy M Supp, J Kevin Bailey, Heather M Powell

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Comparison of biopolymer scaffolds for the fabrication of skin substitutes in a porcine wound model.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis of Superficial and Deep Partial-Thickness Burn Wounds in Yorkshire vs Red Duroc Pigs.Journal of burn care & research : official publication of the American Burn Association · 2022
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. [Roles of interleukin-6/signal transduction and activator of transcription 3 pathway andZhonghua shao shang za zhi = Zhonghua shaoshang zazhi = Chinese journal of burns · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Britani N BlackstoneDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Jayne Y KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Kevin L McFarlandResearch Department, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Chandan K SenDepartment of Surgery and Comprehensive Wound Center, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Dorothy M SuppResearch Department, Shriners Hospitals for Children, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Kevin BaileyCritical Care, Trauma and Burns, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Heather M PowellDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
The Ohio State University · USShriners Hospitals for Children - Cincinnati · USThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center · US

Funding

Wound Healing Endpoint and RecurrenceR01NR015676 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GORDILLO, GAYLE M, ROY, SASHWATI · 2015 to 2019
$2.6M
Redox Control of Wound HealingR01GM069589 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2004 to 2013
$2.3M
Tissue Oxygenation and Wound HealingR01GM077185 · NIGMS · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K · 2007 to 2016
$2.3M
Biofilms and Immunity in Chronic WoundsR01NR013898 · NINR · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI SEN, CHANDAN K, WOZNIAK, DANIEL J · 2012 to 2016
$2.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM069589NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM077185NINR NIH HHS R01 NR013898NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scar research is challenging because rodents do not naturally form excessive scars, and burn depth, size, and location cannot be controlled in human longitudinal studies. The female, red Duroc pig model has been shown to form robust scars with biological and anatomical similarities to human hypertrophic scars. To more closely mimic the mode of injury, recreate the complex chemical milieu of the burn wound environment and enhance scar development, an animal model of excessive burn-induced scarring was developed and compared with the more commonly used model, which involves excisional wounds created via dermatome. Standardized, full-thickness thermal wounds were created on the dorsum of female, red Duroc pigs. Wounds for the dermatome model were created using two different total dermatome settings: ∼1.5 mm and ≥ 1.9 mm. Results from analysis over 150 days showed that burn wounds healed at much slower rate and contracted more significantly than dermatome wounds of both settings. The burn scars were hairless, had mixed pigmentation, and displayed fourfold and twofold greater excess erythema values, respectively, compared with ∼1.5 mm and ≥ 1.9 mm deep dermatome injuries. Burn scars were less elastic, less pliable, and weaker than scars resulting from excisional injuries. Decorin and versican gene expression levels were elevated in the burn group at day 150 compared with both dermatome groups. In addition, transforming growth factor-beta 1 was significantly up-regulated in the burn group vs. the ∼1.5 mm deep dermatome group at all time points, and expression remained significantly elevated vs. both dermatome groups at day 150. Compared with scars from dermatome wounds, the burn scar model described here demonstrates greater similarity to human hypertrophic scar. Thus, this burn scar model may provide an improved platform for studying the pathophysiology of burn-related hypertrophic scarring, investigating current anti-scar therapies, and development of new strategies with greater clinical benefit.

Indexed as

SwineAnimalsBurnsCicatrix, HypertrophicContractureDecorinDisease Models, AnimalErythemaFemaleGene Expression RegulationSpecies SpecificityTransforming Growth Factor beta1Wound HealingDecorinTransforming Growth Factor beta1

Identifiers

PMID28727221
PMCPMC5690826
OpenAlexW2737968706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.