Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28726767›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2017

Fat Taste Sensitivity Is Associated with Short-Term and Habitual Fat Intake.

Andrew Costanzo, Liliana Orellana, Caryl Nowson, Konsta Duesing, Russell Keast

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialTwin Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. NIH Workshop Report: sensory nutrition and disease.The American journal of clinical nutrition · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Preferences for Sweet and Fatty Taste in Children and Their Mothers in Association with Weight Status.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andrew CostanzoCentre for Advanced Sensory Sciences, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong 3220, Australia. andrew.costanzo@deakin.edu.au.
Liliana OrellanaBiostatistics Unit, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong 3220, Australia. l.orellana@deakin.edu.au.
Caryl NowsonInstitute of Physical Activity and Nutrition, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong 3220, Australia. caryl.nowson@deakin.edu.au.
Konsta DuesingCSIRO Health & Biosecurity, North Ryde 2113, Australia. konsta.duesing@csiro.au.
Russell KeastCentre for Advanced Sensory Sciences, School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap Street, Geelong 3220, Australia. russell.keast@deakin.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence suggests individuals less sensitive to fat taste (high fat taste thresholds (FTT)) may be overweight or obese and consume greater amounts of dietary fat than more sensitive individuals. The aims of this study were to assess associations between FTT, anthropometric measurements, fat intake, and liking of fatty foods. FTT was assessed in 69 Australian females (mean age 41.3 (15.6) (SD) years and mean body mass index 26.3 (5.7) kg/m²) by a 3-alternate forced choice methodology and transformed to an ordinal scale (FT rank). Food liking was assessed by hedonic ratings of high-fat and reduced-fat foods, and a 24-h food recall and food frequency questionnaire was completed. Linear mixed regression models were fitted. FT rank was associated with dietary % energy from fat ( β ^ = 0.110 [95% CI: 0.003, 0.216]), % energy from carbohydrate ( β ^ = -0.112 [-0.188, -0.035]), and frequency of consumption of foods per day from food groups: high-fat dairy ( β ^ = 1.091 [0.106, 2.242]), meat & meat alternatives ( β ^ = 0.669 [0.168, 1.170]), and grain & cereals ( β ^ = 0.771 [0.212, 1.329]) (adjusted for energy and age). There were no associations between FT rank and anthropometric measurements or hedonic ratings. Therefore, fat taste sensitivity appears to be associated with short-term fat intake, but not body size in this group of females.

Indexed as

Food PreferencesTasteTaste ThresholdAdolescentAdultAgedAustraliaBody Mass IndexChoice BehaviorDietDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDietary ProteinsFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFatty Acids, UnsaturatedFemaleDietary CarbohydratesDietary FatsDietary ProteinsFatty Acids, MonounsaturatedFatty Acids, UnsaturatedBMIfat intakefat tastelikingsensitivitytaste thresholdswomen

Identifiers

PMID28726767
PMCPMC5537895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.