Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28726418›Full record

ArticleJournal of proteome research2017

Quantitative Assessment of the Effects of Trypsin Digestion Methods on Affinity Purification-Mass Spectrometry-based Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis.

Yueqing Zhang, Hong Sun, Jing Zhang, Allan R Brasier, Yingxin Zhao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of proteome research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Label-Free Quantitative Phosphoproteomics of the Fission YeastInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yueqing ZhangDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) , Galveston, Texas 77555, United States.
Hong SunDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) , Galveston, Texas 77555, United States.
Jing ZhangDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) , Galveston, Texas 77555, United States.
Allan R BrasierDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) , Galveston, Texas 77555, United States.
Yingxin ZhaoDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch (UTMB) , Galveston, Texas 77555, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8872-5860
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USJohn Sealy Hospital · US

Funding

UTMB Clinical and Translational Science AwardUL1TR001439 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MED BR GALVESTON · PI URBAN, RANDALL J · 2015 to 2024
$40.0M
Virus, Tissue Culture and ImmunoassayP01AI062885 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI GAROFALO, ROBERTO P · 2005 to 2022
$23.9M
Synthetic Organic Chemistry CoreP30ES006676 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI ELFERINK, CORNELIS JOHAN · 1995 to 2017
$21.7M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001439NIAID NIH HHS P01 AI062885NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES006676
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Affinity purification-mass spectrometry (AP-MS) has become the method of choice for discovering protein-protein interactions (PPIs) under native conditions. The success of AP-MS depends on the efficiency of trypsin digestion and the recovery of the tryptic peptides for MS analysis. Several different protocols have been used for trypsin digestion of protein complexes in AP-MS studies, but no systematic studies have been conducted on the impact of trypsin digestion conditions on the identification of PPIs. Here, we used NFκB/RelA and Bromodomain-containing protein 4 (BRD4) as baits and test five distinct trypsin digestion methods (two using "on-beads," three using "elution-digestion" protocols). Although the performance of the trypsin digestion protocols change slightly depending on the different baits, antibodies and cell lines used, we found that elution-digestion methods consistently outperformed on-beads digestion methods. The high-abundance interactors can be identified universally by all five methods, but the identification of low-abundance RelA interactors is significantly affected by the choice of trypsin digestion method. We also found that different digestion protocols influence the selected reaction monitoring (SRM)-MS quantification of PPIs, suggesting that optimization of trypsin digestion conditions may be required for robust targeted analysis of PPIs.

Indexed as

ProteolysisA549 CellsBromodomain Containing ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsChromatography, AffinityHumansMass SpectrometryNuclear ProteinsProtein Interaction MappingTranscription Factor RelATranscription FactorsTrypsinBRD4 protein, humanBromodomain Containing ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsNuclear ProteinsRELA protein, humanTranscription Factor RelATranscription FactorsTrypsinaffinity purificationmass spectrometryprotein−protein interactionselected reaction monitoringtrypsin digestion

Identifiers

PMID28726418
PMCPMC5656008
OpenAlexW2738074773

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.