Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28726143›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

Endoscopic management of post-laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy stenosis.

Valérie Deslauriers, Amélie Beauchamp, Fabio Garofalo, Henri Atlas, Ronald Denis, Pierre Garneau, Radu Pescarus

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Valérie DeslauriersDivision de Chirurgie Bariatrique, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, 5400 Boul. Gouin Ouest, Montréal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Amélie BeauchampDivision de Chirurgie Bariatrique, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, 5400 Boul. Gouin Ouest, Montréal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Fabio GarofaloDivision de Chirurgie Bariatrique, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, 5400 Boul. Gouin Ouest, Montréal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Henri AtlasDivision de Chirurgie Bariatrique, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, 5400 Boul. Gouin Ouest, Montréal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Ronald DenisDivision de Chirurgie Bariatrique, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, 5400 Boul. Gouin Ouest, Montréal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Pierre GarneauDivision de Chirurgie Bariatrique, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, 5400 Boul. Gouin Ouest, Montréal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada.
Radu PescarusDivision de Chirurgie Bariatrique, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Département de Chirurgie, Université de Montréal, 5400 Boul. Gouin Ouest, Montréal, QC, H4J 1C5, Canada. radupes@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0523-4311
Hôpital du Sacré-Cœur de Montréal · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most popular bariatric surgery worldwide. Gastric sleeve stenosis is the most common postoperative complication, occurring in up to 3.9% of the cases. Current treatment options include endoscopic treatments, such as dilatations and stent placement as well as surgical revisions such as laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB), wedge gastrectomy or seromyotomy.

methodsA retrospective analysis of our prospectively collected therapeutical endoscopy database was performed between January 2014 and February 2017. We included all cases of axial deviation or stenosis post LSG, which were treated endoscopically. Patients with concomitant sleeve leaks were excluded. Endoscopic interventions were performed under general anaesthesia and fluoroscopic assistance when needed. Sequential treatment with CRE balloons, achalasia balloons (30-40 mm) and fully covered stent placement for refractory cases was performed.

resultsA total of 1332 LSG were performed. Overall, 27/1332 patients (2%) developed a gastric stenosis. All patients presented an axial deviation at the incisura angularis and 26% had a concomitant proximal stenosis. Successful endoscopic treatments were performed in 56% (15/27) of patients, 73% of the successful patients underwent a single dilatation procedure. All successful cases had a maximum of 3 interventions. The unsuccessful cases (44%) underwent LRYGB. Mean time between the primary surgery and the diagnosis of the stenosis was 10.3 months. Mean follow-up after the endoscopic treatment was 11.5 months. A stent migration was the only complication (3.7%) recorded.

conclusionsEndoscopic treatment appears to be effective in 56% of patients with post-LSG stenosis. Only one session of achalasia balloon dilatation is necessary in 73% of successful cases. Pneumatic balloon dilatation seems to be a safe procedure in this patient population. Surgical revision into a LRYGB offers good outcomes in patients that have failed three consecutive endoscopic treatments.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultConstriction, PathologicDilatationFemaleGastrectomyGastric BalloonHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAchalasia balloonBariatric revisionCRE balloonEndoscopic dilatationFully covered stentSleeve gastrectomy stenosis

Identifiers

PMID28726143
OpenAlexW3143152285

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.