ArticleClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2018
Assessing predicted age-specific breast cancer mortality rates in 27 European countries by 2020.
Article in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06130241 (Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Initially Node Positive Breast Cancer Patients, Could it Omit Axillary Dissection ?), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Initially Node Positive Breast Cancer Patients, Could it Omit Axillary Dissection ?
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing authoritative oncology-related key opinion leaders on Weibo: A social media profiling study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Application of patient journey mapping in patients with breast cancer: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Digital Health Literacy and Person-Centred Care: Co-Creation of a Massive Open Online Course for Women with Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- A Digital Cancer Ecosystem to Deliver Health and Psychosocial Education as Preventive Intervention.Cancers · 2022Article
- BC-N102 suppress breast cancer tumorigenesis by interfering with cell cycle regulatory proteins and hormonal signaling, and induction of time-course arrest of cell cycle at G1/G0 phase.International journal of biological sciences · 2021Article
- Article
- Omitting radiotherapy is safe in breast cancer patients ≥ 70 years old after breast-conserving surgery without axillary lymph node operation.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Investigation of the Association between Drinking Water Habits and the Occurrence of Women Breast Cancer.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Enhance PARPi Application beyond BRCA-Mutant Breast Cancer (BC): Facts Are Facts.Journal of clinical medicine · 2020Article
- MiRNA-96-5p impacts the progression of breast cancer through targeting FOXO3.Thoracic cancer · 2020Article
- Ascertaining breast cancer patient experiences through a journey map: A qualitative study protocol.PloS one · 2020Article
- Breast cancer mortality trends in Europe among women in perimenopausal and postmenopausal age (45+).Archives of medical science : AMS · 2020Article
- Predictors and Trend in Attendance for Breast Cancer Screening in Lithuania, 2006-2014.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019Article
- Epidemiological characteristics of and risk factors for breast cancer in the world.Breast cancer (Dove Medical Press) · 2019Review
- Long-term crude probabilities of death among breast cancer patients by age and stage: a population-based survival study in Northeastern Spain (Girona-Tarragona 1985-2004).Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWe assessed differences in predicted breast cancer (BC) mortality rates, across Europe, by 2020, taking into account changes in the time trends of BC mortality rates during the period 2000-2010.
methodsBC mortality data, for 27 European Union (EU) countries, were extracted from the World Health Organization mortality database. First, we compared BC mortality data between time periods 2000-2004 and 2006-2010 through standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) and carrying out a graphical assessment of the age-specific rates. Second, making use of the base period 2006-2012, we predicted BC mortality rates by 2020. Finally, making use of the SMRs and the predicted data, we identified a clustering of countries, assessing differences in the time trends between the areas defined in this clustering.
resultsThe clustering approach identified two clusters of countries: the first cluster were countries where BC predicted mortality rates, in 2020, might slightly increase among women aged 69 and older compared with 2010 [Greece (SMR 1.01), Croatia (SMR 1.02), Latvia (SMR 1.15), Poland (SMR 1.14), Estonia (SMR 1.16), Bulgaria (SMR 1.13), Lithuania (SMR 1.03), Romania (SMR 1.13) and Slovakia (SMR 1.06)]. The second cluster was those countries where BC mortality rates level off or decrease in all age groups (remaining countries). However, BC mortality rates between these clusters might diminish and converge to similar figures by 2020.
conclusionsFor the year 2020, our predictions have shown a converging pattern of BC mortality rates between European regions. Reducing disparities, in access to screening and treatment, could have a substantial effect in countries where a non-decreasing trend in age-specific BC mortality rates has been predicted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28726040What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.