Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28725992›Full record

ArticlePrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2018

Social Profile of Middle School-Aged Adolescents Who Use Electronic Cigarettes: Implications for Primary Prevention.

Alfgeir L Kristjansson, Michael J Mann, Megan L Smith, Inga Dora Sigfusdottir

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alfgeir L KristjanssonDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA. alkristjansson@hsc.wvu.edu.
Michael J MannDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
Megan L SmithDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, School of Public Health, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, 26505, USA.
Inga Dora SigfusdottirIcelandic Center for Social Research and Analysis, Reykjavik University, Reykjavik, Iceland.

Funding

SAMHSA HHS RC-P1601194Sisters Health Foundation, Parkersburg WV f2014-hl-30
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electronic cigarette (EC) use continues to increase among adolescents. From a primary prevention point of view, an important gap in our knowledge includes determining whether young smokers that use EC maintain a distinct social profile from kids who use combustible cigarettes (CC). Survey data from middle school students in West Virginia, USA were collected between September and November of 2015 (N = 6547, response rate 84.7%) as part of a state wide school-based mental health intervention program. Data was analyzed using multinomial logistic regression for categorical data. The results show that compared to never smokers, EC-only users possessed a weaker social support and parental monitoring profile and performed worse in school. Additionally, EC-only users were more likely to feel alienated from school, to associate with delinquent peers, to spend time outside late at night, and to engage in unsupervised gatherings with their friends. In 11 of 13 statistical models no difference was observed between EC-only users compared with CC-only users. However, dual users (that had used both EC and CC in their lifetime) demonstrated a significantly greater risk profile compared with EC-only users. We conclude that middle school-aged kids that use EC share a similar risk profile as kids of the same age that use CC. Similar to traditional cigarette smoking, EC use in young adolescents is likely to be a social marker of a pathway to further delinquency and should therefore be subject to primary prevention approaches.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsPrimary PreventionSmoking PreventionSocial BehaviorAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesHumansLogistic ModelsSchoolsSurveys and QuestionnairesWest VirginiaEarly adolescentsElectronic cigarettesMiddle schoolPrimary prevention

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.