Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28725932›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of legal medicine2018

DNA methylation in ELOVL2 and C1orf132 correctly predicted chronological age of individuals from three disease groups.

M Spólnicka, E Pośpiech, B Pepłońska, R Zbieć-Piekarska, Ż Makowska, A Pięta, J Karłowska-Pik, B Ziemkiewicz, M Wężyk, P Gasperowicz and 5 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of legal medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

M SpólnickaCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Aleje Ujazdowskie 7, 00-583, Warsaw, Poland.
E PośpiechDepartment of Genetics and Evolution, Institute of Zoology of the Jagiellonian University, Gronostajowa 9, 30-387, Krakow, Poland.
B PepłońskaLaboratory of Neurogenetics, Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warszawa, 5 Pawinskiego St, Warsaw, Poland.
R Zbieć-PiekarskaCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Aleje Ujazdowskie 7, 00-583, Warsaw, Poland.
Ż MakowskaCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Aleje Ujazdowskie 7, 00-583, Warsaw, Poland.
A PiętaCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Aleje Ujazdowskie 7, 00-583, Warsaw, Poland.
J Karłowska-PikFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Chopina 12/18, 87-100, Toruń, Poland.
B ZiemkiewiczFaculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Chopina 12/18, 87-100, Toruń, Poland.
M WężykLaboratory of Neurogenetics, Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warszawa, 5 Pawinskiego St, Warsaw, Poland.
P GasperowiczDepartment of Medical Genetics, Centre for Biostructure, Medical University of Warsaw, Pawińskiego 3c, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.
T BednarczukDepartment of Internal Medicine and Endocrinology, Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
M BarcikowskaLaboratory of Neurogenetics, Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warszawa, 5 Pawinskiego St, Warsaw, Poland.
C ŻekanowskiLaboratory of Neurogenetics, Department of Neurodegenerative Disorders, Mossakowski Medical Research Center, Polish Academy of Sciences, 02-106 Warszawa, 5 Pawinskiego St, Warsaw, Poland.
R PłoskiDepartment of Medical Genetics, Centre for Biostructure, Medical University of Warsaw, Pawińskiego 3c, 02-106, Warsaw, Poland.
Wojciech BranickiCentral Forensic Laboratory of the Police, Aleje Ujazdowskie 7, 00-583, Warsaw, Poland. wojciech.branicki@uj.edu.pl.
Centralne Laboratorium Kryminalistyczne Policji · PLPolish Academy of Sciences · PLMedical University of Warsaw · PLJagiellonian University · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PL

Funding

National Centre for Research and Development in Poland DOBR/0002/R/ID1/2012/03
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Improving accuracy of the available predictive DNA methods is important for their wider use in routine forensic work. Information on age in the process of identification of an unknown individual may provide important hints that can speed up the process of investigation. DNA methylation markers have been demonstrated to provide accurate age estimation in forensics, but there is growing evidence that DNA methylation can be modified by various factors including diseases. We analyzed DNA methylation profile in five markers from five different genes (ELOVL2, C1orf132, KLF14, FHL2, and TRIM59) used for forensic age prediction in three groups of individuals with diagnosed medical conditions. The obtained results showed that the selected age-related CpG sites have unchanged age prediction capacity in the group of late onset Alzheimer's disease patients. Aberrant hypermethylation and decreased prediction accuracy were found for TRIM59 and KLF14 markers in the group of early onset Alzheimer's disease suggesting accelerated aging of patients. In the Graves' disease patients, altered DNA methylation profile and modified age prediction accuracy were noted for TRIM59 and FHL2 with aberrant hypermethylation observed for the former and aberrant hypomethylation for the latter. Our work emphasizes high utility of the ELOVL2 and C1orf132 markers for prediction of chronological age in forensics by showing unchanged prediction accuracy in individuals affected by three diseases. The study also demonstrates that artificial neural networks could be a convenient alternative for the forensic predictive DNA analyses.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationAcetyltransferasesAdolescentAdultAgedAgingAlzheimer DiseaseCase-Control StudiesChildChild, PreschoolCpG IslandsFatty Acid ElongasesFemaleForensic GeneticsGenetic MarkersGraves DiseaseAcetyltransferasesELOVL2 protein, humanFatty Acid ElongasesFHL2 protein, humanGenetic MarkersIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsKLF14 protein, humanKruppel-Like Transcription FactorsLIM-Homeodomain ProteinsMembrane ProteinsMetalloproteinsMuscle ProteinsSp Transcription FactorsTranscription FactorsTRIM59 protein, humanTripartite Motif ProteinsAlzheimer’s diseaseChronological ageDNA methylationGraves’ diseaseNeural networksPrediction accuracy

Identifiers

PMID28725932
PMCPMC5748441
OpenAlexW2737864684

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.