Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28725924›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2017

Effect of training status on beta-range corticomuscular coherence in agonist vs. antagonist muscles during isometric knee contractions.

Fabien Dal Maso, Marieke Longcamp, Sylvain Cremoux, David Amarantini

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Projection of Cortical Beta Band Oscillations to a Motor Neuron Pool across the Full Range of Recruitment.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabien Dal MasoDépartement de Kinésiologie, Université de Montréal, 2100 Boulevard Édouard-Montpetit, Montréal, QC, H3C 3J7, Canada. fabien.dalmaso@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7676-9655
Marieke LongcampLNC, CNRS-Aix-Marseille Université, 3 Place Victor-Hugo, 13331, Marseille Cedex 3, France.
Sylvain CremouxLAMIH, UMR CNRS 8201, Université de Valenciennes et du Hainaut Cambrésis, Valenciennes, France.
David AmarantiniToulouse NeuroImaging Center, Université de Toulouse, Inserm, UPS, Toulouse, France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversité Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antagonist muscle co-activation is thought to be partially regulated by cortical influences, but direct motor cortex involvement is not fully understood. Corticomuscular coherence (CMC) measures direct functional coupling of the motor cortex and muscles. As antagonist co-activation differs according to training status, comparison of CMC in agonist and antagonist muscles and in strength-trained and endurance-trained individuals may provide in-depth knowledge of cortical implication in antagonist muscle co-activation. Electroencephalographic and electromyographic signals were recorded, while 10 strength-trained and 11 endurance-trained participants performed isometric knee contractions in flexion and extension at various torque levels. CMC magnitude in 13-21 and 21-31 Hz frequency bands was quantified by CMC analysis between Cz electroencephalographic electrode activity and all electromyographic signals. CMC was significant in both 13-21 and 21-31 Hz frequency bands in flexor and extensor muscles regardless of participant group, torque level, and direction of contraction. CMC magnitude decreased more in antagonist than in agonist muscles as torque level increased. Finally, CMC magnitude was higher in strength-trained than in endurance-trained participants. These findings provide experimental evidence that the motor cortex directly regulates both agonist and antagonist muscles. Nevertheless, the mechanisms underlying muscle activation may be specific to their function. Between-group modulation of corticomuscular coherence may result from training-induced adaptation, re-emphasizing that corticomuscular coherence analysis may be efficient in characterizing corticospinal adaptations after long-term muscle specialization.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAdultElectroencephalographyElectromyographyHumansIsometric ContractionKneeMaleMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalMuscle StrengthPhysical Conditioning, HumanPhysical EnduranceResistance TrainingYoung AdultCo-activationCortical regulationPrimary motor cortexTime–frequency analysisTraining-induced adaptation

Identifiers

PMID28725924
OpenAlexW2737248144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.