Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28725734›Full record

ReviewNPJ microgravity2016

Towards human exploration of space: the THESEUS review series on neurophysiology research priorities.

Olivier White, Gilles Clément, Jacques-Olivier Fortrat, Anne Pavy-LeTraon, Jean-Louis Thonnard, Stéphane Blanc, Floris L Wuyts, William H Paloski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NPJ microgravity, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Olivier WhiteCognition, Actions et Plasticité, Sensorimotrice, INSERM UMR1093, UFR STAPS, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
Gilles ClémentInternational Space University, Strasbourg, France.
Jacques-Olivier FortratCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Explorations Fonctionnelles Vasculaires, UMR CNRS 6214 Inserm 1083, Angers, France.
Anne Pavy-LeTraonCentre Hospitalier Universitaire, Département de Neurologie, Toulouse, France.
Jean-Louis ThonnardInstitute of Neuroscience, Université catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Stéphane BlancUniversité de Strasbourg, IPHC, Strasbourg, France.
Floris L WuytsAUREA - BIMEF, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
William H PaloskiUniversity of Houston, Health and Human Performance, Houston, TX, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The THESEUS project (Towards Human Exploration of Space: a European Strategy), initiated within the seventh Framework Programme by the European Commission, aimed at providing a cross-cutting, life-science-based roadmap for Europe's strategy towards human exploration of long space missions, and its relevance to applications on Earth. This topic was investigated by experts in the field, in the framework of the THESEUS project whose aim was to develop an integrated life sciences research roadmap regarding human space exploration. In particular, decades of research have shown that altered gravity impairs neurological responses at large, such as perception, sleep, motor control, and cognitive factors. International experts established a list of key issues that should be addressed in that context and provided several recommendations such as a maximal exploitation of currently available resources on Earth and in space.

Identifiers

PMID28725734
PMCPMC5515521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.