ArticleNPJ microgravity2015
The influence of simulated microgravity on the proteome of
Article in NPJ microgravity, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Endocrine Disruption in Freshwater Cladocerans: Transcriptomic Network Perspectives on TBOEP and PFECHS Impacts inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Enhanced assembly of bacteriophage T7 produced in cell-free reactions under simulated microgravity.NPJ microgravity · 2024Article
- Effect of Space Flight Factor on Dormant Stages in Aquatic Organisms: A Review of International Space Station and Terrestrial Experiments.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Effects of Simulated Microgravity on the Proteome and Secretome of the Polyextremotolerant Black FungusFrontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Quantitative Proteomics Reveals Remodeling of Protein Repertoire Across Life Phases of Daphnia pulex.Proteomics · 2019Article
- Response of extreme haloarchaeon Haloarcula argentinensis RR10 to simulated microgravity in clinorotation.3 Biotech · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe waterflea
methodsIn this study, we applied a proteomic approach to identify key proteins and pathways involved in the response of
resultsWe identified 109 protein spots differing in intensity (
conclusionsThe affected biological processes were also described in other studies using different organisms and systems either aiming to simulate microgravity conditions or providing real microgravity conditions. Moreover, most of the
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.