Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28725572›Full record

ArticleBBA clinical2017

Novel panel of protein biomarkers to predict response to bortezomib-containing induction regimens in multiple myeloma patients.

Kay Reen Ting, Michael Henry, Justine Meiller, Annemarie Larkin, Martin Clynes, Paula Meleady, Despina Bazou, Paul Dowling, Peter O'Gorman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BBA clinical, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Proteomics-inspired precision medicine for treating and understanding multiple myeloma.Expert review of precision medicine and drug development · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kay Reen TingMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland.
Michael HenryNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Justine MeillerNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Annemarie LarkinNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Martin ClynesNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Paula MeleadyNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Despina BazouMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland.
Paul DowlingNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Peter O'GormanMater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin 7, Ireland.
Dublin City University · IEMater Misericordiae University Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple myeloma (MM) is a complex heterogeneous disease. Various risk stratification models have been recommended including cytogenetic and FISH analysis to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from novel treatments, but such facilities are not widely available. The International Scoring System (ISS) using beta-2-microglobulin and albumin remains a widely used prognostic scoring system in many clinical practices; however it is not useful in predicting response to treatment in MM. The aim of this study is to identify clinically useful biomarkers to predict response to treatment containing bortezomib.

methods17 MM patient serum samples (9 responders/8 non-responders) were used for the discovery phase (label-free mass spectrometry) and an additional 20 MM patient serum samples were used for the ELISA-based validation phase (14 responders/6 non-responders).

resultsCLU and ANG mean levels were higher in the responders group, while Complement C1q had lower concentrations. The combination of all standard biomarkers (albumin, beta-2-microglobulin (ß2M), paraprotein and kappa/lambda (K/L) ratio) had an AUC value of 0.71 with 65% correct classification, while an overall combination of new candidate protein biomarkers with standard biomarkers had an AUC value of 0.89 with 85.3% correct classification.

conclusionsA combination of new and standard biomarkers consisting of CLU, ANG, C1Q, albumin, ß2M, paraprotein and K/L ratio may have potential as a novel panel of biomarkers to predict MM response to treatment containing bortezomib. GENERAL SIGNIFICANCE: Use of this biomarker panel could facilitate a more personalized therapy approach and to minimize unnecessary side effects from ineffective drugs.

Indexed as

BiomarkersBortezomibMass spectrometryProteomics

Identifiers

PMID28725572
PMCPMC5502697
OpenAlexW2622843898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.