Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28725462›Full record

ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2015

A differential network analysis approach for lineage specifier prediction in stem cell subpopulations.

Satoshi Okawa, Vladimir Espinosa Angarica, Ihor Lemischka, Kateri Moore, Antonio Del Sol

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Plant metabolite diosmin as the therapeutic agent in human diseases.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Stem cells and lung regeneration.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. PeerJ · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Satoshi OkawaLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Vladimir Espinosa AngaricaLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Ihor LemischkaIchan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Kateri MooreIchan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA.
Antonio Del SolLuxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine (LCSB), University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
University of Luxembourg · LUMount Sinai Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStem cell differentiation is a complex biological process. Cellular heterogeneity, such as the co-existence of different cell subpopulations within a population, partly hampers our understanding of this process. The modern single-cell gene expression technologies, such as single-cell RT-PCR and RNA-seq, have enabled us to elucidate such heterogeneous cell subpopulations. However, the identification of a transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) for each cell subpopulation within a population and genes determining specific cell fates (lineage specifiers) remains a challenge due to the slower development of appropriate computational and experimental workflows. Here, we propose a computational differential network analysis approach for predicting lineage specifiers in binary-fate differentiation events.

methodsThe proposed method is based on a model that considers each stem cell subpopulation being in a stable state maintained by its specific TRN stability core, and cell differentiation involves changes in these stability cores between parental and daughter cell subpopulations. The method first reconstructs topologically different cell-subpopulation specific TRNs from single-cell gene expression data, literature knowledge and transcription factor (TF)-DNA binding-site prediction. Then, it systematically predicts lineage specifiers by identifying genes in the TRN stability cores in both parental and daughter cell subpopulations.

resultsApplication of this method to different stem cell differentiation systems was able to predict known and putative novel lineage specifiers. These examples include the differentiation of inner cell mass into either primitive endoderm or epiblast, different progenitor cells in the hematopoietic system, and the lung alveolar bipotential progenitor into either alveolar type 1 or alveolar type 2.

conclusionsThe method is generally applicable to any binary-fate differentiation system, for which single-cell gene expression data are available. Therefore, it should aid in understanding stem cell lineage specification, and in the development of experimental strategies for regenerative medicine.

Identifiers

PMID28725462
PMCPMC5516870
OpenAlexW2176243996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.