ArticleNPJ systems biology and applications2015
A differential network analysis approach for lineage specifier prediction in stem cell subpopulations.
Article in NPJ systems biology and applications, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Plagl1 regulates the retinal progenitor cell to Müller glial cell transition.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Emergent dynamics of cellular decision making in multi-node mutually repressive regulatory networks.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2025Article
- Role of ZNF143 and Its Association with Gene Expression Patterns, Noncoding Mutations, and the Immune System in Human Breast Cancer.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Synthesis of Silver Nano Particles Using Myricetin and the In-Vitro Assessment of Anti-Colorectal Cancer Activity: In-Silico Integration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Multi-staged gene expression profiling reveals potential genes and the critical pathways in kidney cancer.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Plant metabolite diosmin as the therapeutic agent in human diseases.Current research in pharmacology and drug discovery · 2022Review
- A Network-Guided Approach to Discover Phytochemical-Based Anticancer Therapy: Targeting MARK4 for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Understanding the role of potential pathways and its components including hypoxia and immune system in case of oral cancer.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Proneural genes define ground-state rules to regulate neurogenic patterning and cortical folding.Neuron · 2021Article
- In-Silico Study of Immune System Associated Genes in Case of Type-2 Diabetes With Insulin Action and Resistance, and/or Obesity.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Article
- Stem cells and lung regeneration.American journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2020Review
- Insights Into the Role and Potential of Schwann Cells for Peripheral Nerve Repair From Studies of Development and Injury.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2020Article
- Article
- NetDiff - Bayesian model selection for differential gene regulatory network inference.Scientific reports · 2016Article
- Modeling heterogeneity in the pluripotent state: A promising strategy for improving the efficiency and fidelity of stem cell differentiation.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStem cell differentiation is a complex biological process. Cellular heterogeneity, such as the co-existence of different cell subpopulations within a population, partly hampers our understanding of this process. The modern single-cell gene expression technologies, such as single-cell RT-PCR and RNA-seq, have enabled us to elucidate such heterogeneous cell subpopulations. However, the identification of a transcriptional regulatory network (TRN) for each cell subpopulation within a population and genes determining specific cell fates (lineage specifiers) remains a challenge due to the slower development of appropriate computational and experimental workflows. Here, we propose a computational differential network analysis approach for predicting lineage specifiers in binary-fate differentiation events.
methodsThe proposed method is based on a model that considers each stem cell subpopulation being in a stable state maintained by its specific TRN stability core, and cell differentiation involves changes in these stability cores between parental and daughter cell subpopulations. The method first reconstructs topologically different cell-subpopulation specific TRNs from single-cell gene expression data, literature knowledge and transcription factor (TF)-DNA binding-site prediction. Then, it systematically predicts lineage specifiers by identifying genes in the TRN stability cores in both parental and daughter cell subpopulations.
resultsApplication of this method to different stem cell differentiation systems was able to predict known and putative novel lineage specifiers. These examples include the differentiation of inner cell mass into either primitive endoderm or epiblast, different progenitor cells in the hematopoietic system, and the lung alveolar bipotential progenitor into either alveolar type 1 or alveolar type 2.
conclusionsThe method is generally applicable to any binary-fate differentiation system, for which single-cell gene expression data are available. Therefore, it should aid in understanding stem cell lineage specification, and in the development of experimental strategies for regenerative medicine.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.