ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2018
Feasibility of the trial procedures for a randomized controlled trial of a community-based peer-led wheelchair training program for older adults.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Wheelchair Self-efficacy Enhanced Training Program to Improve Wheelchair Use in Older Adults
Evaluation of a Peer-led eHealth Wheelchair Skills Training Program: Training to Enhance Adaptation and Management for Wheelchair Users
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility, safety and efficacy of multi-dose vagus nerve stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomised sham-controlled proof-of-concept study.Journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- Safety and tolerability of adjunct non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in people with parkinson's: a study protocol.BMC neurology · 2023Article
- Social participation of individuals with spinal injury using wheelchairs in rural Tanzania after peer training and entrepreneurial skills training.African journal of disability · 2023Article
- Community mobility and participation assessment of manual wheelchair users: a review of current techniques and challenges.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Impact of the TEAM Wheels eHealth manual wheelchair training program: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.PloS one · 2021Article
- Development of Wheeled Mobility indicators to advance the quality of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: SCI-High Project.The journal of spinal cord medicine · 2019Article
- Implementation Evaluation of an Online Peer-Mentor Training Program for Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury.Topics in spinal cord injury rehabilitation · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum to:2017
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA novel peer-led manual wheelchair (MWC) training program may support the training needs of older adults, but establishing program feasibility is a pragmatic first step. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of a peer-led Wheelchair training Self-Efficacy Enhanced for Use (WheelSeeU) program.
methodsForty MWC users (mean age 65 years) were randomly assigned to the experimental (WheelSeeU) or control group. Feasibility indicators of process, resources, management, and safety were collected throughout the study.
resultsThe consent rate was 49%. Participant retention rate was 90% post-intervention and 87.5% at follow-up (6 months). All participants reported perceived benefits from WheelSeeU. Participants and trainers adhered to the study protocol (>90%), and fidelity of the WheelSeeU intervention was attained (>90%). There were no adverse events.
conclusionsWheelSeeU is an innovative and feasible approach for providing MWC training to older adults that is accessible beyond initial rehabilitation without increased clinician burden. With minor modifications, it is feasible that WheelSeeU can be administered to older adults living in the community.
trial registrationNCT01838135.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.