Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28725416›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Contrasting patterns of selection between MHC I and II across populations of Humboldt and Magellanic penguins.

Nicole Sallaberry-Pincheira, Daniel González-Acuña, Pamela Padilla, Gisele P M Dantas, Guillermo Luna-Jorquera, Esteban Frere, Armando Valdés-Velásquez, Juliana A Vianna

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Nicole Sallaberry-PincheiraLaboratorio de Biodiversidad Molecular Departamento de Ecosistemas y Medio Ambiente Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile.
Daniel González-AcuñaFacultad de Ciencias Veterinarias Universidad de Concepción Chillán Chile.
Pamela PadillaLaboratorio de Biodiversidad Molecular Departamento de Ecosistemas y Medio Ambiente Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile.
Gisele P M DantasPontificia Universidade Catolica de Minas Gerais Belo Horizonte Brazil.
Guillermo Luna-JorqueraUniversidad Católica del Norte Millenium Nucleus of Ecology and Sustainable Management of Oceanic Islands ESMOI Centro de Estudios Avanzados en Zonas Áridas CEAZA Coquimbo Chile.
Esteban FrereCentro de Investigaciones de Puerto Deseado Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia Austral Puerto Deseado Argentina.
Armando Valdés-VelásquezLaboratorio de Estudios en Biodiversidad Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Fisiológicas Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia Lima Peru.
Juliana A ViannaLaboratorio de Biodiversidad Molecular Departamento de Ecosistemas y Medio Ambiente Facultad de Agronomía e Ingeniería Forestal Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile Santiago Chile.
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLNational University of Austral Patagonia · ARPontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidad Católica del Norte · CLUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEUniversity of Concepción · CL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The evolutionary and adaptive potential of populations or species facing an emerging infectious disease depends on their genetic diversity in genes, such as the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). In birds, MHC class I deals predominantly with intracellular infections (e.g., viruses) and MHC class II with extracellular infections (e.g., bacteria). Therefore, patterns of MHC I and II diversity may differ between species and across populations of species depending on the relative effect of local and global environmental selective pressures, genetic drift, and gene flow. We hypothesize that high gene flow among populations of Humboldt and Magellanic penguins limits local adaptation in MHC I and MHC II, and signatures of selection differ between markers, locations, and species. We evaluated the MHC I and II diversity using 454 next-generation sequencing of 100 Humboldt and 75 Magellanic penguins from seven different breeding colonies. Higher genetic diversity was observed in MHC I than MHC II for both species, explained by more than one MHC I loci identified. Large population sizes, high gene flow, and/or similar selection pressures maintain diversity but limit local adaptation in MHC I. A pattern of isolation by distance was observed for MHC II for Humboldt penguin suggesting local adaptation, mainly on the northernmost studied locality. Furthermore, trans-species alleles were found due to a recent speciation for the genus or convergent evolution. High MHC I and MHC II gene diversity described is extremely advantageous for the long-term survival of the species.

Indexed as

AdaptationMHCpositive selectionSpheniscustrans‐species alleles

Identifiers

PMID28725416
PMCPMC5513272
OpenAlexW2526727793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.