Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28724907›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

Measuring the olfactory bulb input-output transformation reveals a contribution to the perception of odorant concentration invariance.

Douglas A Storace, Lawrence B Cohen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 54 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Order code in the olfactory system.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Bilateral Optogenetic Stimulation of the Olfactory Bulb of OMP-ChIEF Mice.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Douglas A StoraceDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA. dstorace@gmail.com.
Lawrence B CohenDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, New Haven, Connecticut, 06520, USA. lawrence.b.cohen@hotmail.com.

Funding

Optical Studies of Neuron Activity and OrganizationR01DC005259 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2002 to 2019
$5.4M
New approaches for better protein voltage sensorsU01NS099691 · NINDS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2016 to 2018
$2.1M
Defining the functions of olfactory bulb processing via comparison of input and outputR21DC016133 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STORACE, DOUGLAS ANTHONY · 2017 to 2019
$479k
Optical Studies of Neuron Activity and OrganizationR56DC005259 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN, LAWRENCE B · 2007 to 2007
$413k
Optical imaging of the input and output of the olfactory bulbF32DC012981 · NIDCD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI STORACE, DOUGLAS ANTHONY · 2013 to 2015
$165k
NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC012981NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC005259NIDCD NIH HHS R21 DC016133NIDCD NIH HHS R56 DC005259NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS099691
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Humans and other animals can recognize an odorant as the same over a range of odorant concentrations. It remains unclear whether the olfactory bulb, the brain structure that mediates the first stage of olfactory information processing, participates in generating this perceptual concentration invariance. Olfactory bulb glomeruli are regions of neuropil that contain input and output processes: olfactory receptor neuron nerve terminals (input) and mitral/tufted cell apical dendrites (output). Differences between the input and output of a brain region define the function(s) carried out by that region. Here we compare the activity signals from the input and output across a range of odorant concentrations. The output maps maintain a relatively stable representation of odor identity over the tested concentration range, even though the input maps and signals change markedly. These results provide direct evidence that the mammalian olfactory bulb likely participates in generating the perception of concentration invariance of odor quality.Humans and animals recognize an odorant across a range of odorant concentrations, but where in the olfactory processing pathway this invariance is generated is unclear. By measuring and comparing olfactory bulb outputs to inputs, the authors show that the olfactory bulb participates in generating the perception of odorant concentration invariance.

Indexed as

OdorantsAnimalsFluorescent DyesMiceOlfactory BulbFluorescent Dyes

Identifiers

PMID28724907
PMCPMC5517565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.