Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28724815›Full record

Trial reportIndian journal of ophthalmology2017

Efficacy and safety of intraoperative intracameral mydriasis in manual small incision cataract surgery - A randomized controlled trial.

K Ajay, Srinivasan Saranya, Divya Dabir Sundaresh, H R Hithashree, B C Hemalatha, Malavika Krishnaswamy, Sathyendranath B Shetty

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pharmacologic interventions for mydriasis in cataract surgery.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

K AjayDepartment of Ophthalmology, P. E. S. Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Kuppam, Andhra Pradesh, India.
Srinivasan SaranyaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Divya Dabir SundareshDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
H R HithashreeDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
B C HemalathaDepartment of Ophthalmology, Bangalore Medical College and Research Institute, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Malavika KrishnaswamyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Sathyendranath B ShettyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Ramaiah Medical College, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Shamnur Shivashankarappa Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre · INM.S. Ramaiah Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of intracameral mydriatic solution, as compared to preoperative topical mydriatics, in patients undergoing manual small incision cataract surgery (MSICS) under peribulbar anesthesia. To assess the sustainability of intracameral mydriasis in MSICS by monitoring pupil size at specific junctures during the surgery.

methodsThis trial recruited 127 patients, who underwent MSICS under peribulbar block. Mydriasis in topical group was achieved with preoperative topical dilating drops while patients in intracameral group were taken up for surgery without dilation, and mydriasis was achieved intraoperatively with intracameral solution. Pupil sizes were measured serially, at six different junctures during surgery. Time duration of surgery, any intraoperative complications and first postoperative day visual acuity, corneal edema score, and anterior chamber inflammation score were noted in all patients.

resultsMean pupil size just before peribulbar block was 7.3 mm in topical group and 3.3 mm in intracameral group (P < 0.001). Mean pupil size in intracameral group increased to 7.3 mm 30 s after injecting intracameral dilating solution. Mean pupil size in both groups progressively reduced, reaching 5.5 mm (topical group) and 6.2 mm (intracameral group) just before intraocular lens implantation (P = 0.001), and measured 5.1 mm and 5.5 mm, respectively, at the end of surgery (P = 0.048). On first postoperative day, there was no significant difference in distribution of corneal edema scores, AC inflammation scores, and in median logMAR visual acuity between the two groups.

conclusionsMSICS can be performed effectively and safely utilizing intracameral mydriatic solution, without the use of preoperative dilating drops.

trial registrationCTRI/2016/06/007036.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnterior ChamberCataract ExtractionFemaleHumansInjectionsIntraoperative PeriodMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresMydriasisMydriaticsOphthalmic SolutionsPostoperative ComplicationsMydriaticsOphthalmic Solutions

Identifiers

PMID28724815
PMCPMC5549410
OpenAlexW2737238961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.