ArticleSexually transmitted infections2018
Ten years transmission of the new variant of
Article in Sexually transmitted infections, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- The serodiagnositic value ofFrontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Prevention strategies for sexually transmitted infections, HIV, and viral hepatitis in Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2023Review
- Epidemiology and determinants of reemerging bacterial sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and emerging STIs in Europe.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2023Review
- Genome organization and genomics inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- Genomic Surveillance Enables Suitability Assessment ofJournal of clinical microbiology · 2020Article
- Rise and fall of the new variant ofSexually transmitted infections · 2020Article
- Article
- An Asymptomatic Patient with Fatal Infertility Carried a Swedish Strain ofMicroorganisms · 2019Article
- Relation betweenSexually transmitted infections · 2019Article
- Article
- First Detection ofThe open microbiology journal · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesIn 2006, a new variant of
methods
resultsIn total, 5101
conclusionsThe nvCT proportion has decreased in all counties and converged to a low prevalence irrespective of previous rates. Genotyping showed that nvCT is clonal and genetically stable. Failing detection only marginally affected complication rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.